Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 3.2.10 The crest of the drop structure <br /> of the weir and extends down below the double <br />, be turbulent near the top of the structure, and <br /> 3.2.11 The detention pond will disch <br />. pipe. As described previously and shown on PIa <br /> a small collector channel sloped toward Pion <br /> located at the center of the detention basin sout <br /> It is recommended that reinforced concrete pipe <br /> The upstream invert of the pipe will be the floo <br /> downstream invert elevation will depend on the <br /> put in. The pipe should not be placed on the ch <br /> and yet it should have as much of a positive slo <br /> a 0.5-foot drop. Three outfall sizes were an <br /> concrete pipe. Culvert nomographs from the <br /> calculate discharge through the outlet pipes b <br /> of pipe, roughness, and entrance conditions. <br /> peak discharge they can evacuate and the amo <br /> Table 4 summarizes the results of the analysis <br /> T <br /> DETENTION POND <br /> OUTFALL DIAMETER PEAK D <br /> (inches) <br /> 30 <br /> 42 <br /> 54 <br /> · The time to drain the pond spans from the time when 0 <br /> above the invert. Flow beginning is marked by the point <br /> the water elevation in the channel. For all of the outlet pi <br /> 3.2.12 The final detention pond design <br /> . . <br /> <br />should have a cutoff wall that extends the width <br />riprap layer and filter at least 1 foot. Flow wilJ <br />the cutoff wall wilJ help prevent undercutting. <br /> <br />arge flows back into Pioneer Ditch via an outfall <br />te 3, the basin floor is sloped to the center, and <br />eer Ditch aids in drainage. The outfall will be <br />h wall and will be approximately 70 feet long. <br />be used, but the final choice is up to the City. <br />r of the detention pond at 3916.0 feet msl. The <br />Pioneer Ditch channel invert when the pipe is <br />anne1 bottom because of potential sedimentation, <br />pe as possible. The calculations were based on <br />a1yzed for efficiency: 30-, 42-, and 54-inch <br />reference listed in paragraph 2.9 were used to <br />ased on headwater and tai1water conditions, length <br />The basic differences in the three pipes are the <br />unt of time it will take to draw the pond down. <br /> <br />ABLE 4 <br />OUILET ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />ISCHARGE <br />(cfs) <br /> <br />50 <br /> <br />90 <br /> <br />130 <br /> <br />"TIME TO DRAIN POND <br />(days) <br /> <br />2-3 <br /> <br />1-2 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />utflow begins to when the pond is drawn down to 0.5 foot <br />where the elevation of the water in the pond is higher than <br />pes, outflow begins 1.6 hours after the peak inflow. <br /> <br />will include the pond itself, an overflow weir <br />to divert Pioneer Ditch peak flows mto the pond, a berm between the pond and Pioneer Ditch <br />to prevent flows from entering the pond somewhere other than the weir, and an outfall pipe to <br />drain the pond. The design of the detention pond and weir should be followed closely if the <br />pond is constructed because significant modifications could alter the results of this study. The <br />pond could be deepened if needed, but the method of discharging flows back into the ditch may <br />get more complicated. The outfall pipe size and slope and drop structure slope are variable, <br />depending on the resources at hand. <br /> <br />8 <br />