Laserfiche WebLink
<br />as Bryan and Colston did, sub-basins, consisting of different <br /> <br />land use patterns, were identified and monitored. The results <br /> <br />of the study are summarized in Table 16 using data from all of <br /> <br />the storms sampled. It was found that: <br /> <br />TABLE 16 <br /> <br />Average Peak Concentrations of Pollutants for All Storms Sampled by Rimer, <br />Reynolds and Nissen, Durham, North Carolina <br />(Rimer, Reynolds and Nissen, 1976) <br /> <br /> Percent Average Peak Concentrations (mg/~) <br /> Impervious <br />Land Cover Type Area COD SS TP Pb <br />Low Activity Rural 2.7 41 284 1.40 < 0.1 <br />High Activity Rural 5.1 58 416 0.76 < 0.1 <br />Low Activity Commercial 12 87 575 0.83 0.2 <br />Low Activity Residential 16 166 664 0.84 0.6 <br />High Activity Residential 32 194 1199 1.03 2.1 <br />High Activity Commercial 35 320 1082 1.08 1.7 <br />Central Business District 80 336 528 0.66 O.g <br /> <br />(1) COD levels in stormwater runoff were generally a <br /> <br />function of the amount of development and impervious surface <br /> <br />within the catchment being drained. Increasing values of COD <br /> <br />concentrations can be expected from land cover types which have <br /> <br />an increasing percentage of impervious surfaces. <br /> <br />(2) Suspended solids concentrations were also found to <br /> <br />increase as the percentage of impervious surfaces increases. <br /> <br />Rural areas were found to have the lowest suspended solids <br /> <br />concentration of any of the land uses investigated. The rela- <br /> <br />tively low peak suspended solids concentration in the central <br /> <br />37 <br /> <br />"-- <br />