Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />V HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br />in Lakewood and McIntyre Gulches that can be directly used to <br />estimate the frequency of either major floods or major rainfall <br />events. Therefore, it was necessary to prepare estimated rain- <br />fall events and flood hydrographs indirectly using records <br />and data available from the surrounding area. Major floods <br />in the area result primarily from heavy rainfall. Major floods <br />do not result from snow melt, nor is snow melt considered to <br />increase rainfall floods significantly, because of the relatively <br />low elevation of the contributing watershed. <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br /> <br />The Urban Drainage and Flood Control District directed that <br /> <br /> <br />the hydrology and the description of the analysis as prepared <br /> <br /> <br />by McCall-Ellingson & Morrill, Inc. be accepted for this study. <br /> <br /> <br />The remainder of this chapter is largely a reproduction of the <br /> <br /> <br />hydrology prepared by McCall-Ellingson & Morrill in a report <br /> <br /> <br />titled "Phase A, Preliminary Report on Major Drainageway Plan- <br /> <br /> <br />ning on Lakewood and McIntyre Gulches, Volume 1 Report," dated <br /> <br /> <br />December, 1975, revised January, 1976. The report included an <br /> <br /> <br />analysis of McIntyre Gulch, which is not a part of this study. <br /> <br /> <br />Certain minor revisions of peak flow rates have been made after <br /> <br /> <br />careful evaluation, but the changes are of only academic sig- <br /> <br /> <br />nificance. Portions of the original text which referred to <br /> <br /> <br />hydrology for existing basin conditions, rather than future, <br /> <br /> <br />have been deleted because they are not applicable to this report. <br /> <br /> <br />The table numbers used in the original report have been revised <br /> <br /> <br />to conform to the format and sequence of this report. <br /> <br />Procedure <br /> <br /> <br />The Lakewood and McIntyre Gulch hydrographs were prepared using <br /> <br /> <br />primarily the data and methods presented in the Urban Storm Drain- <br /> <br /> <br />age Criteria Manual, Volume I, Denver Regional Council of Gov- <br /> <br /> <br />ernments, 1969, which is referred to herein as the Drainage <br /> <br /> <br />Criteria Manual. The general sequence followed in preparing <br /> <br /> <br />the hydrographs is as follows: <br /> <br />Floods <br />There are neither stream flow records nor precipitation records <br /> <br />1. Estimate precipitation duration and depth for each fre- <br /> <br /> <br />quency from rainfall records in the areas. <br /> <br /> <br />2. Arrange the total rainfall amount into a typical rainfall <br /> <br /> <br />pattern for the area. <br />3. Estimate the effective rainfall by deducting watershed <br /> <br /> <br />retention and losses from total precipitation. <br /> <br /> <br />4. Determine hydrograph shape using watershed characteristics. <br /> <br /> <br />A computer program was developed to calculate the large number <br /> <br /> <br />of hydrographs that were required. <br /> <br />General <br /> <br /> <br />Flood hydrographs were prepared for 24 hydrologic points along <br /> <br /> <br />Lakewood Gulch amd McIntyre Gulch as shown on Sheet 2 of 23. <br /> <br /> <br />Hydrographs were computed at each point for 2, 5, 10, and 100- <br /> <br /> <br />year frequency floods for future conditions of basin development. <br />