Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TABLE: <br />Missouri Leads the Way in Acquisition Projects <br />FEMA REGION VII ACQUISITION PROJECTS <br />(As of 713/95) <br />Withdrawn <br />or Refused <br />1,065 <br />2 <br />29 <br />11 <br /> <br />STATE # of Approved <br />Projects Properties <br />44 5,305 <br />3 290 <br />13 479 <br />25 759 <br /> <br />MO <br />NE <br />KS <br />lA <br /> <br />Properties <br />Purchased <br />2,958 <br />37 <br />203 <br />305 <br /> <br />Percent <br />Complete <br />69.76 <br />12.85 <br />43.38 <br />40,78 <br /> <br />The Big Flood Buyout Program That Worked <br />From rhe stan ,this flood was different. The water got nearly as high in some places, <br />and nearly the same amount of land was covered. But most of the people who fled <br />to motels, government trailers and emergency shelters in 1993 were gone this time. <br />Many of them accepted government buyouts and moved out of the j/ood plain. <br />.St. Louis Post-Dispatch <br />May 28, 1995 <br /> <br />"We must work together to design and rebuild our communities safer and out of <br />harm's way so the cycle of disasters can be broken. " <br /> <br />As long as the federal government <br />is in the disaster business, the tax- <br />supported costs of floods will <br />remain extensive. They include <br />reimbursement of many local <br />government flood-fighting costs as <br />well as those for repairs to public <br />facilities such as roads as well as <br />water and sewer treatment facilities. <br />After the 1993 flood, Public Assis- <br />tance funds allocated in Missouri <br />equaled $130 million for 14,200 <br />projects. <br />The federal government also pays <br />individual assistance which includes <br />both grants to uninsured property- <br />owners as well as housing assis- <br />tance, The total costs of the 1993 <br />flood were estimated at $4 billion in <br />the State of Missouri. <br />There is also the issue of flood <br />insurance. Conventional <br />homeowners policies normally don't <br />cover flood damage. However, the <br />National Flood Insurance Program <br />(NFIP) exists to create an insurance <br />pool for covering such claims. <br />Unfortunately, less than one in ten <br />people in Missouri's floodplains had <br />flood insurance in 1993. <br /> <br />.James 1.. Witt <br /> <br />II. Pay Now or Pay Later <br /> <br />Improvements to this system are <br />now in place. Congressional reforms <br />now being implemented by the NFIP <br />program dictate that, if someone <br />received federal disaster assistance, <br />they must carry NAP insurance or <br />they are ineligible for future disaster <br />aid. They also require lenders who <br />have loaned money on structures in <br />the flood plain to require the pur- <br />chase of flood insurance. <br />Public sympathy for tax-supported <br />emergency responses to repeated <br />river flooding waned considerably in <br />the two years following the 1993 <br />flood. Tolerance is dropping as it <br />becomes clear that such factors as <br />continued upland development and <br />ever-rising levees conspire to make <br />more frequent flooding the new <br />reality. The only permanent solution <br />then is to reduce the costs by elimi- <br />nating the risks for damage through <br />a proactive floodplain management <br />program, <br />Missouri's Buyout Program is <br />already paying for itself. Over half <br />of the 5,500 targeted properties <br />were purchased in the buyout <br />program since 1993 and, therefore, <br /> <br />When Orna Micke/is makes her <br />almost daily drive through old <br />Cedar City, she sees a home she'll <br />never have again. The house itself is <br />gone, mowed dawn by a bulldozer. <br />But "home" is still there. Despite <br />the /ingering attachment, Ms, <br />Micke/is thinks the government <br />buyout was necessary - especially <br />after what happened again this year. <br /> <br />"They would have kept putting out <br />flood insurance money, and we <br />would have kept going back and <br />repairing. They saved an awful lot <br />of money. " <br />-Jefferson City News Tribune <br />July 1995 <br /> <br />that many properties were unaf- <br />fected by the 1995 event. <br />By way of example, St. Charles <br />County sits at the confluence of the <br />Missouri and Mississippi Rivers. In <br />that county alone, the combined <br />costs of the 1993 flood have ex- <br />ceeded $160 million. <br />The number of potentially occu- <br />pied parcels of property in the 100. <br />year floodplain purchased under the <br />buyout program in St. Charles <br />County was 1374. This included <br />over 560 single family residences <br />and three mobile home parks with <br />814 pads. It's estimated that the <br />occupancy rate in those parks was <br />84% at the time of the 1993 flood. <br />Residents in these repeatedly <br />flooded parks were among the <br />neediest from the standpoint of <br />needing disaster assistance from <br />both public and private sources. <br />When the 1995 spring rains hit, <br />causing the third worst flood of <br />record, 1,000 fewer families (ap- <br />proximately 2,500 people) were out <br />of harm's way as a result of the <br />buyout program in St. Charles <br />County alone. <br />