My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03181
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03181
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:26:32 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:30:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Weld
Community
Greeley
Stream Name
Cache La Poudre River
Basin
South Platte
Title
Master Floodway Plan
Date
8/1/1983
Prepared For
Greeley, CWCB
Prepared By
Simons Li & Associates Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />26 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />27 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Improved river crossings at 8th Street. 5th Street. and 6th Avenue <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />Combination channel. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Advantages <br /> <br />Disadvantaqes <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Advantages <br /> <br />Disadvantages <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Reduces' disruption of <br />transportation during <br />flooding. <br /> <br />Does not eliminate flooding <br />problems for the majority of <br />the study area. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Eliminates flooding prob- <br />lems for 100-year recurrence <br />interval or less. <br /> <br />Requires 300 feet of <br />right-of-way. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Reduces water surface <br />elevations during flooding <br />in the vicinity of <br />bridges. <br /> <br />Does not solve sedimentation <br />problems. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Allows development to <br />edge of channel. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Requires no right-of-way <br />acquisition. <br /> <br />Requires continued dredging. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Provides future multiple use <br />opportunities in the form of <br />greenbelt or a recreational <br />trail. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />4a. Trapezoidal channelization (100-year design flow). <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />Dredging to increase flow area. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Advantages <br /> <br />Disadvantaqes <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Advantages <br /> <br />Disadvantages <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Eliminates flooding prob- <br />lems for 100-year recurrence <br />intervals or less. <br /> <br />Limited multiple use <br />opportunities. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />No right-of-way <br />acquisition required. <br /> <br />Does not eliminate flooding <br />problems. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Allows development of <br />property adjacent to river. <br /> <br />Requires continued dredging. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Lowers water surface <br />elevation and groundwater <br />table at some locations. <br /> <br />Requires continued annual <br />dredging. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Requires only 230 feet of <br />right-of-way. <br /> <br />Meandering low-flow channel may <br />develop causing bank instability. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />May cause bank instability. <br /> <br />Advantages <br /> <br />Disadvantaqes <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />May lower bridge pier capacity <br />and/or create possibilities of <br />piers being washed out. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />4b. <br /> <br />Trapezoidal channelization (50-year design flOW). <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Eliminates flooding prob- <br />lems for the 50-year <br />recurrence interval or <br />less. <br /> <br />Flooding problems for 100-year <br />recurrence interval not <br />eliminated. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Five alternatives were selected for further evaluation. These are: <br /> <br />1. Maintain existing condition. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Reduces floodway width, <br />allowing some development. <br /> <br />Requires continued dredging. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />2. Improved flood control levees. <br /> <br />3a. Trapezoidal channel. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Requires only 200 feet of <br />right-of-way. <br /> <br />Limited multiple use <br />opportunities. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />3b. Combination channel. <br /> <br />Meandering lOW-flow channel may <br />develop causing bank instability. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />4. Combinations of improvements. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Improved river crossings at 8th Street, 5th Street, and 6th Avenue do not <br /> <br />by themselves solve flooding problems, but are required in alternatives 2, 3a, <br /> <br /> <br />3b and 4 as part of the total flood control improvement alternative. Bridges <br /> <br /> <br />at 8th Street and 5th Street require replacement or enlargement. Since 8th <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.