Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />III. HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br /> <br />Floodplain Analysis <br /> <br />The original floodplain analysis performed by the U.S. Army Corps of <br /> <br /> <br />Engineers (COE) utilized an in-house computer model to calculate backwater <br /> <br /> <br />curves. AS part of this study, the results of the previous hydraulic analysis <br /> <br /> <br />were verified utilizing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' HEC-2 water surface <br /> <br />profile computer model (reference 4). <br /> <br /> <br />The first step of the verification process was to conduct field surveys <br /> <br /> <br />to measure existing structures and to select appropriate Manning's "n" rough- <br /> <br /> <br />ness coefficients. A separate nn" value report has been prepared and is on <br /> <br />file at the City of Greeley and the Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> <br /> <br />(reference 5). The "n" values used in this study are from 0.035 to 0.040 <br /> <br /> <br />for the main channel and from 0.035 to 0.055 for the overbanks. Digitized <br /> <br /> <br />cross sections from the previous COE study were obtained and located on the <br /> <br /> <br />topographic maps. The cross sections were checked for accuracy against the <br /> <br /> <br />topographic mapping and, in general, no major discrepancies were noted. The <br /> <br />digitized cross sections were then formatted into HEC-2 format. Initial <br /> <br /> <br />analysis was performed using the original COE parameters and comparisons of <br /> <br /> <br />the 100-year water surface elevation were made. The initial analysis showed <br /> <br /> <br />discrepancies in water surface elevation of about one foot at some locations. <br /> <br /> <br />The verification process was continued by modifying the loss coefficients <br /> <br /> <br />such as expansion and contraction losses, bridge and pier losses, and roughness <br /> <br />values until the water surface elevations determined by the previous study and <br /> <br /> <br />by this study were within 0.1 foot. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Floodway Analysis <br /> <br />Once the 100-year water surface elevation was verified, an encroached <br /> <br /> <br />floodway section was established. The floodway is defined as that area that <br /> <br /> <br />is required to convey the 100-year flood allowing a one-foot rise in the <br /> <br /> <br />natural water surface elevation. A schematic of a floodway is shown in <br /> <br />Figure 6. The overbank area is encroached to a point where the 100-year water <br /> <br /> <br />surface is no more than one foot higher than the natural 100-year water sur- <br /> <br />face. This allows development of property located within the area between the <br /> <br /> <br />floodway boundary and floodplain boundary. <br /> <br />The HEC-2 water surface profile computer model has six methods for deter- <br /> <br /> <br />mination of the floodway. The method used in this study was to establish <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />'I~ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />encroachments based on reduced conveyance of the overbank section. This <br /> <br />method encroaches the floodplain on either side of the channel proportional to <br /> <br /> <br />the natural capacity of the overbank. The floodway determined in this manner <br /> <br /> <br />is approximately equal to the floodway as given in the report entitled "Flood <br /> <br /> <br />Insurance Study, City of Greeley, COlorado, Weld COunty" (reference 3). The <br /> <br /> <br />floodway for the Greeley reach of the Cache la Poudre River is shown in <br /> <br /> <br />Figures 7, 8, and 9. <br /> <br />Bridge Analysis <br /> <br />A factor compounding flooding problems within the City of Greeley is the <br /> <br /> <br />presence of undersized bridges. The bridges at 8th Street, 5th Street and 6th <br /> <br /> <br />Avenue cannot pass the 100-year flood. These bridges are overtopped by floods <br /> <br /> <br />exceeding a 50-year return period. In addition, the limited hydraulic capa- <br /> <br /> <br />City of these three bridges causes backwater conditions resulting in increased <br /> <br /> <br />water surface elevations upstream of the bridges. This backwater condition <br /> <br /> <br />also results in deposition of sediment which reduces channel capacity. <br /> <br /> <br />The 11th Avenue, 8th Avenue, U.S. 85, and Union Pacific Railroad bridges <br /> <br /> <br />all have sufficient hydraulic capacity to pass the 100-year flood without <br /> <br /> <br />overtopping. A summary of bridge capacities is given in Table 2. <br /> <br />Flow Splits <br /> <br />The Greeley reach of the Cache la Poudre River experiences flow splits <br /> <br /> <br />during flooding. At some locations along the river (i.e., upstream of 6th <br /> <br />Avenue), the bank will be overtopped and floodwaters will flow along a path <br /> <br /> <br />parallel to the river, rejoining the main flow further downstream. In some <br /> <br />cases within the City, the existing flood control levee prevents these over- <br /> <br /> <br />bank flow splits from rejoining the channel, creating ponded areas within the <br /> <br /> <br />floodplain. This occured along the west bank between 5th Street and 8th <br /> <br /> <br />Street during the June 1983 flooding, The dikes upstream of 8th Avenue con- <br /> <br />tained the floodwaters in 1983, but if the dikes had failed, a large residen- <br /> <br /> <br />tial and commercial area would have been inundated, resulting in considerable <br /> <br /> <br />property damage. <br />