Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I. INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Central City is a historic gold mining town in the Rocky Mountain eastern <br />slopes located a~proximately 30 miles west of Denver, Colorado. (Refer to <br />Exh i bit A.) Steep slopes and rugged mountai ns resulted in town development <br />along and over gulches which thread through surrounding hills. Pipelines <br />or rock flumes were constructed to convey storm runoff, over which the main <br />business district of town was built. <br /> <br />Inherent with development over natural drainageways are flooding problems. <br />Over the years, the City of Central has had reports prepared and made <br />improvements to help mitigate flooding. A brief history of floodplain <br />management efforts is provided below. <br /> <br />In an effort to protect property owners from the cost of flood damage, a <br />Flood Hazard Boundary Map for Central City was prepared for the Federal <br />Insurance Admin"istration (effective in 1974 and reproduced herein as <br />Exhibit "B"), and Central City entered into the National Flood Insurance <br />Program in 1986. Comparing Exhibits "A" and "B", it can be seen that a <br />large portion of the business district was located within the flood hazard <br />area. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />In 1986, the City of Central requested the assistance of the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board (CWCB) to perform a hydrological and hydraulic study <br />including mapping which would more closely identify flood limits and <br />elevations that the City may better administrate a newly adopted floodplain <br />ordinance. Thll study was performed, providing valuable floodplain <br />information. Their study was used in preparing this report. (See <br />Reference I in the Bibliography.) <br /> <br />Frequently menaced by even the smallest of rainfall events, the next step <br />taken by the City was to have a feasibility study performed which would <br />provide guidance in improving facilities so that flood damage and <br />sedimentation frequency and extent may be reduced. Accordingly, <br />Hydrodynamics Incorporated was retained and prepared a report based on the <br />CWCB study to identify possible improvements, benefits, and costs. (See <br />Reference No.2 in the Bibliography.) However, City funds were limited, <br />so proposed projects were minimized and only served to reduce major <br />flooding related problems from a 2 to 3 year event to nearly a 15 year <br />event. Even so, the City was unable to secure the estimated $519,800.00 <br />required, and proposed improvements were not made. <br /> <br />Sedimentation in streets during summer thundershowers still occurred, major <br />flooding potential still existed, and the main business district remained <br />in a flood hazard area. In an effort to reduce maintenance and limit flood <br />damage, the City pursued steps to remove downtown from the 100-year <br />floodplain and also reduce flood-related maintenance problems. Pursuant <br />to this effort, Rocky Mountain Consultants was retained to analyze previous <br />reports and estimate proposed costs and solutions to remove the downtown <br />area from the 100-year floodplain and reduce maintenance costs. Based on <br />previous reports, an estimate of $1,300,000.00 was made, along with a <br />recommendation that it would be cost effective to have a more detailed <br />study performed. Accordingly, RMC was then retained to perform a detailed <br />