Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I ~ITl( <br /> <br />I engineers. planners. surveyors <br /> <br />May 15, 1991 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Larry F. Lang, P.E., Chief <br />Flood Control and Floodplain Management <br />COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br />721 State Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> <br />Section <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />Cent ra 1 City <br />RMC No. 1671.001.00 <br /> <br />r- <br /> <br />~. ill gJ ~ U <br /> <br />Dear Larry: <br /> <br />We have received your letter dated April 24, 1991 regarding your review of the <br />hydrological and hydraulic feasibility study for Central City. You made four <br />(4) recommendations which we would like to address, itemized in the same <br />manner as your comments. <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />It is our understanding that the concern about reshaping the <br />Bridge/Spring/Main Street intersection is to provide channelization of <br />floodwaters away from the existing downtown area and toward Gregory <br />Gulch, rather than rely solely on inlets and subsurface flows for flood <br />control. We concur 100% that this mitigation approach is normally <br />preferable because of increased reliability and decreased liability. <br />This was also our first choice of flood mitigation. However, after <br />observing the existing elevations, determining cover over a 12" water <br />main, the cost of raising and lowering portions of roadway and parking <br />lot, and alternatives available, extensive intersection rework was <br />determined to be outside of the best interest of the City. <br /> <br />The City would not be without an improvement over previous conditions, <br />however. Improvements are proposed upstream from the location which <br />will remove much of the surface flow and sediment which contributes to <br />the downstream area. The flume handling capacity will be increased by <br />improving the inlet approach and reducing hydraulic jump inside the <br />flume. Facilities will also be provided to divert flume overflow from <br />Nevada Street near the top of the paved parking lot to the flume. This <br />can be oversized beyond what the flume can handle, with excess flow <br />surfacing on and being conveyed over the parking lot. Runoff from the <br />parking lot can more easily be directed toward Spring Street and away <br />from Main Street than runoff corning down Nevada Street. An improved <br />drainage collection and conveyance system will also be provided in Main <br />Street to further reduce flooding potential. <br /> <br />Given the above improvements, the partial redirecting of surface runoff <br />upstream of the intersection, and the fact that the downtown does have a <br />gravity flow outlet in Gregory Street, the planned course of action <br />without significant reshaping of the intersection would provide <br />substantial flood mitigation. <br /> <br />Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. <br />8301 East Prentice Avenue NO.1 01. EnglE>wood. CO 80111 <br />Offices also in Longmont . Boulder. and Estes Park, CO <br /> <br />(303) 741-6000 <br />