My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03064
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD03064
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:26:13 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:26:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Evaluating Scour at Bridges
Date
11/1/1990
Prepared By
Federal Highway Administration
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />y, = depth of floe,d plain flo." at the abutment <br /> <br />Ys = scour depth <br /> <br />Description <br /> <br />K, <br /> <br />VERTICAL-WALL ABU"MENT <br />VERTICAL-WALL ABU~:MENT <br />WITH WING WALLS <br />SPILL-THROUGH <br />ABUTMENT <br /> <br />1.0 <br /> <br />0.82 <br /> <br />0,55 <br /> <br />TABLE 4.1 ABUTMEIlT SLOPE COEFFICIENTS <br /> <br />Froehlich (28) suggested that scour depth be increased by y,/6 if <br />there are dunes in the main channel upstream of the abutment. <br /> <br />CLEAR-WATER SCOUR AT A1' ABUTMENT <br /> <br />Use Equation 7 for live-bed scour since Froehlich's clear-water <br />scour equation presented in Appendix B potentially decreases <br />scour at abutments due to the presence of coarser material, This <br />is unsubstantiated by field data, however, and Froehlich's clear- <br />water scour equation is not recommended. <br /> <br />F. STEP 6. COMPUTE LOCAL SCOUR AT PIERS <br /> <br />1. General, <br /> <br />Local scour at piers is a function of bed material size, flow <br />characteristics, fluid properties and the geometry of the pier. <br />The subject has been studied extensively in the laboratory, but <br />there is limited field data. As a result of the many studies, <br />there are many equatio~s. In geheral, the equations are for <br />live-bed scour in cohesionless sand bed streams, which give <br />similar results. <br /> <br />The FHWA (29) compared many of the more common equaticns in 1984. <br />Comparison of these eqLations is given in Figures 4.4 and 4.5. <br />Some of the equations tave velocity as a variable (normally in <br />the form of a Froude m:.mber), However some equations, such as <br />Laursen's do not incluc.e velocity. A Froude number of 0.3 was <br />used in Figure 4,4 for purposes of comparing commonly used scour <br />equations. In Figure 4,5 the equations are compared with some <br />field data measurements, As can be seen from Figure 4.5, the <br />Colorado state University (CSU) equation encloses all the points, <br />but gives lower values of scour than Jain's, Laursen's and <br />Niell's equations. The CSU equation includes the velccity of the <br /> <br />48 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.