My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03064
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD03064
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:26:13 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:26:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Evaluating Scour at Bridges
Date
11/1/1990
Prepared By
Federal Highway Administration
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />E. STEP 5. LOCAL SCOUR AT ABUTMENTS <br /> <br />1, General, <br /> <br />Equations for predicting scour depths are based almost entirely <br />on laboratory data, For example, Liu, et aI's (1961) (25), <br />Laursen's (1980) (26) and Froehlich's (1989) (27) equations are <br />based entirely on laboratory data. The problem is little field <br />data on abutment scour exist, Liu, et aI's equations were <br />developed by dimensional analysis of the variables and a best-fit <br />line was drawn through the laboratory data. Laursen's equations <br />are based on inductive reasoning of the change in transport <br />relations due to the acceleration of the flow caused by the <br />abutment. Froehlich's equations are derived from a regression <br />analysis of the available laboratory. data. <br /> <br />EQUATIONS FOR ABUTMENT SCOUR ARE FOR THE WORST-CASE CONDITIONS. <br />THEY WILL PREDICT THE MAXIMUM SCOUR THAT COULD OCCUR FOR AN <br />ABUTMENT PROJECTING INTO A STREAM WITH VELOCITIES AND DEPTHS <br />UPSTREAM OF THE ABUTMENT SIMILAR TO THOSE IN THE MAIN CHANNEL. <br />The reason for this is the way the experiments were conducted <br />which do not represent many of the conditions in the field. For <br />example, Liu's experiments were made in a rectangular laboratory <br />flume with a sand bed. The abutments projected out various <br />lengths from one wall or occasionally both walls of the flume . <br />When they projected out from one flume wall then the other wall <br />was taken as the centerline of the bridge. Other researc~ was <br />conducted similarly. Thus, the velocity, depth and sediment <br />transport upstream of the abutment were about the same as in the <br />main channel. Field conditions may have tree lined or vegetated <br />banks, low velocities and shallow depths upstream of the <br />abutment. If there is overland flow it often is at a shallower <br />depth and lower velocity, with little bed material transport. <br />THEREFORE, ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT IS REQUIRED IN DESIGNING <br />FOUNDATIONS FOR ABUTMENTS. IN MANY CASES FOUNDATIONS CAN BE <br />DESIGNED WITH SHALLOWER DEPTHS THAN PREDICTED BY THE EQUATIONS <br />. , <br />AND THE FOUNDATIONS PROTECTED WITH RIPRAP PLACED BELOW THE STREAM <br />BED OR A GUIDE BANK (SPUR DIKE) PLACED UPSTREAM OF THE ABUTMENT. <br />COST WILL BE THE DECIDING FACTOR. A METHOD TO DETERMINE THE <br />LENGTH OF A GUIDE BANK IS GIVEN IN APPENDIX C. <br /> <br />2. Abutment Site Conditions. <br /> <br />Abutments can be set back from the natural stream bank or can <br />project out into the flow, They can have various shapes <br />(vertical walls, spill through slopes) and they can be set at an <br />angle to the flow Scour at abutments can be live-bed or clear- <br />water scour, Finally, there can be varying amounts of overbank <br />flow intercepted by the approaches to the bridge and returned to <br />the stream at the abutment. <br /> <br />45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.