My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03064
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD03064
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:26:13 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:26:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Evaluating Scour at Bridges
Date
11/1/1990
Prepared By
Federal Highway Administration
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e. For Deep Foundations (Drilled Shaft And Driven Pilinq) <br />with Footinqs Or Caps, <br /> <br />Placing the top of the footing or pile cap below <br />streambed a depth equal to the estimated contraction <br />scour depth will minimize obstruction to flood flows <br />and resulting local scour. Even lower footing <br />elevations may be desirable for pile supported footings <br />when the piles could be damaged by erosion and <br />corrosion from exposure to river currents. <br /> <br />f. Stub Abutments on Pilinq <br /> <br />Stub abutments positioned in the embankment should be <br />founded on piling driven below the elevation of the <br />thalweg in the bridge waterway to assure structural <br />integrity in the event the thalweg shifts and the <br />piling scour to the thalweg elevation. <br /> <br />8. Repeat the procedure in Steps 2 - 6 above and calculate the <br />scour for a superflood. It is recommended that this <br />superflood or check flood be on the order of a 500-year <br />event or a flood 1.7 times the magnitude of the lOa-year <br />flood if the magnitude of the 500-year flood can not be <br />estimated. However, flows greater or less than these <br />suggested floods may be appropriate depending upon <br />hydrologic considerations and ~he consequences associated <br />with damage to the bridge, An overtopping flood within the <br />range of the lOa-year to 500-year floc~ may produce the <br />worst-case situation for checking the foundation design. <br />The foundation design determined under step 7 should be <br />reevaluated for the superflood condition and design <br />modifications made where required. <br /> <br />o Check to make sure that the bottom of spread footings on <br />soil or weathered rock is below the scour depth for the <br />superflood. <br /> <br />o All foundations should have a minimum factor of safety <br />of 1.0 (ultimate load) under the superflood conditions. <br />Note that in actual practice, the calculations for step <br />8 would be performed concurrently with steps 1 through 7 <br />for efficiency of operation. <br /> <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.