Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Colorado WOlter' Cons(lrvation Board <br />Flood Control and Floodplain Management Section <br /> <br />FINDINGS AI~D DETERMINATIONS FOR RULE 5 <br /> <br />DETAILED INFORMATION <br /> <br />Stream names: <br /> <br />COPtL <br /> <br />C R.€ e "" <br /> <br />Communities: Wpt..CI Ct\u"'-ll'Y } ERIE <br />Report title: 'FLfIQ~ :r...\S<lRAOc.t- $tV[)I/:;'S <br />Report date: Cl/;)S/QO <br />Engineer: (If different from title) {3 uREl\u "f" RlOCL.A\'fIA1'IOO <br />Prior Designation No. (is any) if'b' a.wP 11' 1'14 <br /> <br />Does the topographic base mapping meet the minimum <br />standards of Rule 5.A.? <br /> <br />j yes <br /> <br />no <br /> <br />Does the hydrologic analyses meet the minimum <br />standards of Rule 5.B.? <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />yes <br /> <br />no <br /> <br />Have the effects of dams been taken into account <br />subject to the criteria of Rule 7 ? <br /> <br />j yes <br /> <br />no <br /> <br />Does the hydraulic analysis meet the minimum standardsj <br />of Rule S.C. ? _____ yes <br /> <br />no <br /> <br />Have the effects of levees been taken into account <br />subject to the criteria of Rule 8 ? <br /> <br />J <br />yes <br /> <br />nl' <br /> <br />Does the published report and map meet the minimum <br />standards of Rule S.D.? <br /> <br />/ yes <br /> <br />nl' <br /> <br />Was the information developed by a qualified individual <br />meeting standards of Rule 5.E.? yes <br /> <br />no <br /> <br />Reviewer's Comments: 0 1M: t <br />3100 Feet u r <>t-:rea_ <br /> <br />, <br />pn.t.o,", d "...l<lIscreQ... <br />1'1 P PQT'r~ s.ct-<>~t- <br /> <br />of' "p..., t:- <br /> <br />./ Approve <br /> <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION: <br />Reason for disapproval: <br /> <br />Recommended by: _~ \k> ' "'b_o i.. <br /> <br />Disapprove <br /> <br />Date: <br /> <br />(;;)/267io <br />, . <br /> <br />-4-, <br />