Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Potential Objectiions to Floodplain <br /> <br />Regulations <br /> <br />A program of floodplain management Can bring opposition from sectors of <br />the community ranging from those opposed to certain aspects of the flood- <br />plain program to those opposed to the wllole concept of floodplain manage. <br />ment. Below are some hypo1hotical objections raised by members of the <br />community and some information which can be used in rE!SpOnse. <br /> <br />Objection <br />'I don't know why you're worrying about floods in this area. Your maps are <br />wrong. My grandfather homesteaded here seventy years ago, and it's never <br />come clos" 10 /loading. I'd like to subdivide that land, and you're just devalu- <br />ing it by dr3.wing that line on your map." <br /> <br />Response <br />The area~, that are studied in a particular community are selectE~d jointly by <br />Federal, State, and local officials. An attempt is made to select areas where a <br />combination of potential flood hazard and existing and anticipatEld develop- <br />ment may pose problems for the community. When the areas have been <br />selected, the most current, accepted engineering and mapping methods are <br />used to delineate the 1 DO-year floodplain. It is entirely possible for one hun- <br />dred years to have passed without a 1 DO-year flood on a given stream reach, <br />just as it is possible to have had Ulree 1 aO-year floods in a ten-y"ar period. <br />Federal and State agencies will aiways provide for appeals of floodplain <br />delineations. Anyone affect"d may appeal by submitting to State and Federal <br />officials engineering data which may show that there are errors in the flood- <br />plain delineations or that conditions have changed sufficiently to warrant a <br />modification of those delineation~,. <br />With regard to devaluing the property; if an area is found to be within the <br />1 DO-year floodplain, then it was within the floodplain before the map was pre- <br />pared, it was just not previously delineated. As legal decisions hav13 <br />indicated. the land was already burdened by a "natural dtainage easement" <br />and was thereby less suiteel for certain land uses than similar land outside of <br />the floodplain. <br /> <br />Objectil>n <br /> <br />"If you institute these t1oodp/ain regu/alions, all of this land will be useless. <br />None of us will be able to do anything with it." <br /> <br />Response <br />Most floodplain regulations divide the floodplain into a t100dway and flood <br />fringe. In the floodway, land uses are strictly limited; certain uses, 11Owever, <br />are allowed, such as agricultural development, recreation, or open space <br />associatect with nearby residential, commercial, or industrial uses. In the <br />flood fringe uses are not as strictly limitEld. The prime concern in the flood <br />fringe is that certain engineering standards are followed; then msidential, <br />commercial, or industrial uses can be permitted. In some communities it is <br />possible t.~ build flood control facilities to make more land developable. Pro- <br />perty owners still have options for using their land as long as potential <br />dangers tl) public safety am addnessed. <br /> <br />41 <br />