My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03020
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD03020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:26:06 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:24:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
All
Basin
Statewide
Title
Floodplain Management Manual for Local Government
Date
9/1/1993
Prepared For
State of Colorado
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />='~.::"""'-:~2 --:-;'51 ~ <br /> <br />::--UXlD .s"t-~~ <br />~c..EVA.'fIClN :::-TA"-;CI\. <br />_':'701. 74 + :,C <br />5704 --;'6.0- 4C <br />570[, ~e .;.- 10 <br />S-;ce- 7'?.... 5~ <br />'571C E: +--'10 <br />S"'12 83":- '30 <br />~:!4- e5+-20 <br />S~ I;;' 671-20 <br /> <br />1- <br /> <br />SAMPLE PLOTTING TABLE (STEP 3) <br /> <br />Critical Sub Critical <br /> <br />Sub Cnllcal <br /> <br /> <br />REGIMES OF FLOW <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />, / <br />~ .f. " , <br />1,,-,' <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />LOCATING FLOOD CONTOURS <br />(STEPS 4 AND 5) <br /> <br />FINISHED FLOOD BOUNDARIES <br />(STEP 6) <br /> <br />information. Maintainin9 this continuity between studies will improve the <br />workability of a floodplain management program, <br />Jevelopers of land in the floodplain who use flood elevations established In <br />a floodplain study as a guide must use that information accurately. The <br />establishment of field survey datum continuity between the study results anel <br />the on-the-ground conditions is a major factor to accomplish this, This can be <br />done through: <br />. Uniform Datum Standards --- The base levels, elevations. and mapping <br />may be tied to a sinlJle local datum; it is preferrable however, that they <br />be tied to the National Datum (MSL for verUcal datl1fT! and Slate Plane <br />Coordinates for horizontal datum). By tying to the National Datum, <br />uniformity is maintained within the region, the state, and the nation. <br />. Benchmarks -- Permanent elevations can be established in the field <br />through a program of monumentaUon in the field, This can be accom- <br />plished easily by using Federaliy establish,.d benchmarks where avail- <br />able. Where Federal benchmarks do not exist within a community, it is <br />beneficial to construct a control marker network. By having control <br />markers with known elevations, property owners can more easily and <br />accurately determine their own flood hazard risks through conventional <br />field surveying procedures. <br />Floodways <br />Two basic concepts for dividing the 1 OO-year floodplain into a ffoodway and <br />a flood fringe are the Rise Concept and the Hazard ArHa Concept <br />The Rise Concept, speGifies a maximum allowable rise (.5' or 1.0') in water <br />~;urface elevations due to encroachment into the floodplain while still allow- <br />ing passage of the> 1 OO..year flood (provided hazardous velocities, which are <br />those in excess of 3 feet per second (fps), are not produced). <br />The Hazard Area Concept, specifies the area with a water depth of 18 <br />inches or greater and a water velocity of 3 Ips or greater as the floodway <br />which must be kept free of development. <br />The Rise Concept is based on an "acceptable rise" criterion, This rise <br />criterion assumes that encroachment occurs on the edges of the floodplain <br />on both sides until the 1 OO-year water surtace IS increased by ,5 foot or 1.0 <br />foot. It is suited to wide, flat-sloped, and wHII-dE,fined floodplains where con. <br />veyance capacity must be preserved. By assuming encroachment into the <br />floodplain from both sides, the floodway line may be calculated. Often thiS IS <br />conservative, since development may not take place at every point. <br />The rise floodway determination has some drawbacks. It is an expenSive <br />process and it may allow for inconsistent development. FEMA's floadway <br />ljuidelines require equal reduction in stream conveynacH capacity from both <br />,;ides of the floodplain. This equal reduction is an attempt to treat all land. <br />owners on both sides of the stream equitably and give all an opportunity to <br />develop some of this capacity by placement of fill. There is, however, some <br />prOVision for variance from the requirement. Use of this variance provision <br />can mean that some> property owners may have more developable land In the <br />l'Ioodplain and some property owners may have less. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.