Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />"Structural defense tactics <br />alone means lost initiatives <br />in perimeter fire control." <br /> <br />"We have a difficult land <br />ownership/protection <br />problem. " <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />"We may not be able to <br />defend some of our <br />department's interface <br />areas against wildfires." <br /> <br />"Interface" occurs in all areas - from the brushlands of the foothills, to <br />the pifion-juniper "deserts" in southern Colorado, to the pine forests in the <br />Black Forest to lodgepole thickets in high elevations. Interface is even <br />within the city limits of cities such as Breckenridge, Colorado Springs, <br />Durango, Frisco and Vail. <br /> <br />As development continues into wildlands, it adds new dimensions of <br />difficulty to fire protection, increases costs and dollar losses and presents <br />high fire threats to those improvements and to the public. Wildfire control <br />in the interface has become a tactical exercise of moving from structure to <br />structure on a case,by-case basis, often over inadequate access roads, with <br />limited water supplies and inappropriate equipment. The interface also <br />demands more rapid, costly fire attack from the air. Structural defense <br />becomes primary thereby allowing fire perimeters to easily grow and <br />threaten more improvements and natural resources. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Reasons for the Interface <br /> <br />Specific reasons for dwellings and buildings outside cities and towns vary <br />with each site. General reasons for the wildland/urban interface in <br />Colorado are: <br /> <br />1. Land ownership patterns <br />Public and private lands in Colorado's forest and brush lands are highly <br />mixed. Much of this is due to random early settlement, homesteading, <br />mining claims, lands set aside during statehood and public lands managed <br />by a variety of public agencies. Except for the highest elevations, few <br />large forested tracts exist without some intermingled ownerships. <br /> <br />These complex, intermingled ownership patterns also compound the fire <br />protection problem. Each jurisdiction must respond to wildfires <br />threatening its land. Duplication of fire responses easily results. <br /> <br />2. Escape to rural living <br />Despite the state's pristine reputation, Colorado residents want to avoid <br />the noise, pollution, crowds, rules, taxes and hectic pace of city lifestyles. <br />They seek the serene and peaceful wildlands to raise their families and live <br />out their retirement years. Colorado's mountains beckon in the distance, <br />and land developers are busy providing the buyer with building sites. It is <br />not uncommon for people to commute as much as one hour each way from <br />their home in rural forest and brush areas to their jobs in the city. <br /> <br />Urban residents and nonresidents want that "cabin" in the woods, to get <br />away if only for a weekend. Increasing urbanization of outdoor recreation <br />areas is now common and many of the "cabins" are condominiums and <br />expensive homes - built virtually under the boughs of the forest. These <br />people believe the more hidden and inaccessible to the "outside world," <br />the better. <br /> <br />The result: motels, condominiums, summer camps, ski resorts, hunting <br />retreats and residential subdivisions are located on natural resource <br />wildlands and former ranchlands and more are being developed every <br />year. <br /> <br />3 <br />