Laserfiche WebLink
<br />A <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />SCOUR AND FILL iN STEEP, SAND.BED EPHEMERAL STREAMS <br /> <br />569 <br /> <br />At unit discharges greater than about O.5m1/m's (5 cfslfr), the as- <br />,ul11prion of fully rough now is valid, and the calculated flow v~. <br />lacier is great enough ro reasonably assure char bed forms are an- <br />(IJunes. At unit discharges below O.lm3/m's (1 dslEr) , the calcu- <br />IJced flow velocities are so low that the assumption of anridunes <br />becomes suspect. Thus, a transition of bed forms from anridunes to <br />dunes probably occurs in the main projea reach at a unit dis(harge <br />occween 0.1 and 0.5 m3/m's. <br />Depch of interdune troughs below mean-bed elevation is nor an <br />3nalyrical function of flow parameters. One can expect, however, <br />[hat dune size wit! nor be as sensitive (0 flow variations as antidune <br />~lze. Also, as can be seen for ripples in Figure 6b, ~d reworking by <br />Junes will be greater than that by antidunes unless maximum dis- <br />..:hJrge is much greater than that for dune-regime flow. Thus, in a <br />hypothetical sand-bed ephemeral stream where all bed reworking is <br />by bed forms and where a discontinuous depth versus discharge re- <br />lation exists. one would expect scour-chain dat3. to show a limited <br />range of scour and fill below some threshold discharge. The <br />rhreshold discharge would be that at which antidune amplitude is <br />~qual to the maximum depm of dune troughs, because dunes <br />tormed on the waning flow would erase the effects of any smaller <br />Jnridunes. <br />Leopold and orhers' (1966) dara as presemed in Figure 10 can <br />be interpreted as suggescing such a relation for rhe Arroyo de los <br />Frijoles. Maximum scour data for unit discharges below 0.5 mJim's <br />5 cfslft) require an envelope that changes but little wich unic dis- <br />~'hi:lrge. Above 0.5 m3/m's, scour dara suggest a trend following the <br />Jnridune zone, but of smaller amplitude. However, it was found <br />jerh in Quatal Creek and the laborarory that flow estimations <br />?redicted the maximum antidune amplitude, nor the mean <br />Jmplitude. Any flow tends to form high-velociry zones with widths <br />,hat are only a fraerion of the mean stream width. particularlY' in <br />llluvia!-bank channels of grear widrh-deprh ratios (KennedY'. 1961; <br />~oley, 1975). The largest antidunes and greatesr scour and fill occur <br />.,1 these zones, as suggested by Figure 4. Thus, average depth of <br />-naximum scour for a cross section is not a reliable indicator of <br />maximum flow conditions and lx:d reworking. Leopold and others' <br />! 966) average data do not conflier with the hypothesis mat all bed <br />~eworking in the Arroyo de los Frijoles was by bed forms. <br />These calrulations for the Arroyo de los Frijoles are admittedly <br />~n.lde, since channel data used were not measured for the purpose <br />)f antidune~amplirude estimation, and rhe possibiliry of a discon- <br />'Inuous deprh Versus discharge relation precludes quantitative bed- <br />:nrm size estimation at lower dischatges. Thus, it is possible chat <br />,orne mean-bed scour and fill did occur. A definitive estimate of <br />nean-bed versus local scour and fill would require a scour-chain <br />\c'twork in the test reach, such as chat used in Quatal Creek but <br />':.xrending along a much longer reach, and measurements of flow <br />j~prh in rhe test reach in addition to measurements of discharge. <br /> <br />CONG.USIONS <br /> <br />Conclusions concerning scour and fill in a steep. sand-bed <br />'phemeral "ream are based on combined field and laboratory ex. <br />:-oerimems. Data were derived from floods of moderate discharge in <br />I nacural channel in January and December 1974, a series of labo- <br />".lfOry floods in rigid-wall and alluvial-bank channels. and pub- <br />I';oed field data. <br />Scour and fill for simulared floods in a uniform sand-bed labora- <br />'ory channel at grade results predominandy from bed-form de- <br />. dopmenc and migration. Scour and fill for moderate floods in a <br />"ldJ ephemeral channel is c.:onsistcnr wirh theoretical estimates of <br />"cworking of the bed by bed forms. <br />Flood flow in the field stream was judged to be enrirely in (he <br /> <br />a.ncidune regime because of steep gradient, lack of evidence for re. <br />sidual bed forms rdared to a lower flow regime. and beha\'ior of <br />scour-cords. Reasoning based on bed and bank sediment and chan- <br />nel geometry suggests that the field stream is at grade despite net <br />change in bed elevation over the shorr observarional period. S(our <br />and fill measured by scour-cords was equal to bankfull water depth <br />in the january, 1974 flood and rwice banklull warer deprh in the <br />Decembu 1974 flood. In borh instances it was less than the upper <br />limit of estimated antidune amplitude. Thus, scour and fill mea- <br />sured by scour-cords for the [VIa major floods can be explained <br />theoretically by bed-form migration, but this is a qualified conclu- <br />sion since the floods were nor directly observed or gaged. <br />For laboratory floods modeled after ephemeral stream floods, <br />maximum change in mean-bed elevation resulring from mean-bed <br />scour and fill was only 0.06 cm lor a rigid. wall channel a[ grade. <br />For these floods, the depth to the bed-form troughs was 2.2 em, so <br />mean-bed fill and scour was negligible (3%) compared ro <br />maximum local scour and fill. Maximum ripple development oc- <br />curred near the end of the flood, at minimum aischarge. <br />In the laboratory, mean-bed fill and scour was strongly <br />influenced by (I) the ad hoc sediment-input rate and (2) the <br />dynamic effect of discontinuous deprh versus velocity relacions. <br />Sediment-input rate decayed faster than sediment-transport rate., so <br />the maintenance of channel grade tequired a surplus of sediment <br />input during the waxing phase of a flood to compensate for the <br />sediment~input deficiency on the waning phase. The rime required <br />for deveIopmenc of finite bed roughness during transition from the <br />upper to the lower flow regime was the cause of a greater. than- <br />equilibrium velociry and greater sediment transporr-as the flood <br />waned Both the ad hoc sediment-input rate and the bed~roughness <br />time lag resulted in a small amoum of mean-bed fill and scour. <br />Transirion from upper to lower flow regimes could produce (he <br />same effeer in a natural scream with a discontinuous depth versus <br />velocity telarion, provided that the rate of change of discharge is of <br />the same order or greater than the rate of change of bed roughness. <br />Since flow at the field sire was seemingly all in the upper flow re~ <br />gime. this presumably did not occur. <br />Application of [he antidune-amplitude estimation technique to <br />the Arroyo de Ios Frijoles in New Mexico shows that Leopold and <br />orhers' (1966) scour.and.fill dara lor rhe main project reach can be <br />ocplained as well by bed reworking br antidunes as by mean-bed <br />scour and fill for flows wirh maximum unit discharges greater than <br />0.5 mJ/m's. For flows with maximum unit discharges less rhan 0.5 <br />mJ/m's, anridune bed reworking may be masked by dune re-.vorking <br />during the waning flow. This last effeer is sperulaove since the stage <br />versus discharge relation for the main projecr reach waS nor re- <br />ported by rhose authors. <br /> <br />ACKNOWLEDGMEi'\fTS <br /> <br />This work ben~rted grearly from discussions and suggeStions by <br />R. P. Sharp and V. A. Vanoni. [gratefully acknowledge rhe careful <br />criticisms of the manuscript by V. -R. Baker, W. W. Emmett, and <br />C. F. Nordin, Jr. Field work in the Los Padres National Forest waS <br />perloemed wirh rhe permission 01 rhe U,$, Foresr Sel'Vice. Field <br />work was supported by a research grant from the Geological Soci- <br />ery of America, laboratory work was supported by grams from rhe <br />Army Research Office and the National Science Foundation, <br /> <br />REfERENCES CITED <br /> <br />Baker. Victor R.. 1973. Paleohydrology Jnd scdimemology of !....;l!.:.~ .\1i:;- <br />soula Rooding in eascern Washington: Geol. Soc. Amerio Spec. Paper <br />144,79 p. <br /> <br />;j <br />" <br /> <br />;'! <br /> <br />" <br />'I <br />ili <br />'I <br />1.1. <br />II: <br />,'. <br />1,1" <br />:,Ii <br />i'll <br />II: <br />, I' <br />d <br />'I' <br />ill <br />II" <br />, I <br />, ' <br />',! <br />'Ii <br />'II <br />',II' <br />I <br />':1 <br />:j <br /> <br />i ~ <br />:ii! <br />:Ii I <br />1', ,I <br />:1;,1 <br /> <br />:ilj, <br />'W:[ <br />fir' I <br />:II: I <br />iil : <br />I' . <br />:,: I' <br />,., <br /> <br />:iiiii' <br />.,1111 <br />'I' <br />i,ll: <br />II!! ! <br />;llll <br />'I:; ! <br />" , <br />'1_1 i <br />"1 I <br />Iii <br />:-: I <br />" <br />j"ll <br />11, ! <br />