<br />A
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />SCOUR AND FILL iN STEEP, SAND.BED EPHEMERAL STREAMS
<br />
<br />569
<br />
<br />At unit discharges greater than about O.5m1/m's (5 cfslfr), the as-
<br />,ul11prion of fully rough now is valid, and the calculated flow v~.
<br />lacier is great enough ro reasonably assure char bed forms are an-
<br />(IJunes. At unit discharges below O.lm3/m's (1 dslEr) , the calcu-
<br />IJced flow velocities are so low that the assumption of anridunes
<br />becomes suspect. Thus, a transition of bed forms from anridunes to
<br />dunes probably occurs in the main projea reach at a unit dis(harge
<br />occween 0.1 and 0.5 m3/m's.
<br />Depch of interdune troughs below mean-bed elevation is nor an
<br />3nalyrical function of flow parameters. One can expect, however,
<br />[hat dune size wit! nor be as sensitive (0 flow variations as antidune
<br />~lze. Also, as can be seen for ripples in Figure 6b, ~d reworking by
<br />Junes will be greater than that by antidunes unless maximum dis-
<br />..:hJrge is much greater than that for dune-regime flow. Thus, in a
<br />hypothetical sand-bed ephemeral stream where all bed reworking is
<br />by bed forms and where a discontinuous depth versus discharge re-
<br />lation exists. one would expect scour-chain dat3. to show a limited
<br />range of scour and fill below some threshold discharge. The
<br />rhreshold discharge would be that at which antidune amplitude is
<br />~qual to the maximum depm of dune troughs, because dunes
<br />tormed on the waning flow would erase the effects of any smaller
<br />Jnridunes.
<br />Leopold and orhers' (1966) dara as presemed in Figure 10 can
<br />be interpreted as suggescing such a relation for rhe Arroyo de los
<br />Frijoles. Maximum scour data for unit discharges below 0.5 mJim's
<br />5 cfslft) require an envelope that changes but little wich unic dis-
<br />~'hi:lrge. Above 0.5 m3/m's, scour dara suggest a trend following the
<br />Jnridune zone, but of smaller amplitude. However, it was found
<br />jerh in Quatal Creek and the laborarory that flow estimations
<br />?redicted the maximum antidune amplitude, nor the mean
<br />Jmplitude. Any flow tends to form high-velociry zones with widths
<br />,hat are only a fraerion of the mean stream width. particularlY' in
<br />llluvia!-bank channels of grear widrh-deprh ratios (KennedY'. 1961;
<br />~oley, 1975). The largest antidunes and greatesr scour and fill occur
<br />.,1 these zones, as suggested by Figure 4. Thus, average depth of
<br />-naximum scour for a cross section is not a reliable indicator of
<br />maximum flow conditions and lx:d reworking. Leopold and others'
<br />! 966) average data do not conflier with the hypothesis mat all bed
<br />~eworking in the Arroyo de los Frijoles was by bed forms.
<br />These calrulations for the Arroyo de los Frijoles are admittedly
<br />~n.lde, since channel data used were not measured for the purpose
<br />)f antidune~amplirude estimation, and rhe possibiliry of a discon-
<br />'Inuous deprh Versus discharge relation precludes quantitative bed-
<br />:nrm size estimation at lower dischatges. Thus, it is possible chat
<br />,orne mean-bed scour and fill did occur. A definitive estimate of
<br />nean-bed versus local scour and fill would require a scour-chain
<br />\c'twork in the test reach, such as chat used in Quatal Creek but
<br />':.xrending along a much longer reach, and measurements of flow
<br />j~prh in rhe test reach in addition to measurements of discharge.
<br />
<br />CONG.USIONS
<br />
<br />Conclusions concerning scour and fill in a steep. sand-bed
<br />'phemeral "ream are based on combined field and laboratory ex.
<br />:-oerimems. Data were derived from floods of moderate discharge in
<br />I nacural channel in January and December 1974, a series of labo-
<br />".lfOry floods in rigid-wall and alluvial-bank channels. and pub-
<br />I';oed field data.
<br />Scour and fill for simulared floods in a uniform sand-bed labora-
<br />'ory channel at grade results predominandy from bed-form de-
<br />. dopmenc and migration. Scour and fill for moderate floods in a
<br />"ldJ ephemeral channel is c.:onsistcnr wirh theoretical estimates of
<br />"cworking of the bed by bed forms.
<br />Flood flow in the field stream was judged to be enrirely in (he
<br />
<br />a.ncidune regime because of steep gradient, lack of evidence for re.
<br />sidual bed forms rdared to a lower flow regime. and beha\'ior of
<br />scour-cords. Reasoning based on bed and bank sediment and chan-
<br />nel geometry suggests that the field stream is at grade despite net
<br />change in bed elevation over the shorr observarional period. S(our
<br />and fill measured by scour-cords was equal to bankfull water depth
<br />in the january, 1974 flood and rwice banklull warer deprh in the
<br />Decembu 1974 flood. In borh instances it was less than the upper
<br />limit of estimated antidune amplitude. Thus, scour and fill mea-
<br />sured by scour-cords for the [VIa major floods can be explained
<br />theoretically by bed-form migration, but this is a qualified conclu-
<br />sion since the floods were nor directly observed or gaged.
<br />For laboratory floods modeled after ephemeral stream floods,
<br />maximum change in mean-bed elevation resulring from mean-bed
<br />scour and fill was only 0.06 cm lor a rigid. wall channel a[ grade.
<br />For these floods, the depth to the bed-form troughs was 2.2 em, so
<br />mean-bed fill and scour was negligible (3%) compared ro
<br />maximum local scour and fill. Maximum ripple development oc-
<br />curred near the end of the flood, at minimum aischarge.
<br />In the laboratory, mean-bed fill and scour was strongly
<br />influenced by (I) the ad hoc sediment-input rate and (2) the
<br />dynamic effect of discontinuous deprh versus velocity relacions.
<br />Sediment-input rate decayed faster than sediment-transport rate., so
<br />the maintenance of channel grade tequired a surplus of sediment
<br />input during the waxing phase of a flood to compensate for the
<br />sediment~input deficiency on the waning phase. The rime required
<br />for deveIopmenc of finite bed roughness during transition from the
<br />upper to the lower flow regime was the cause of a greater. than-
<br />equilibrium velociry and greater sediment transporr-as the flood
<br />waned Both the ad hoc sediment-input rate and the bed~roughness
<br />time lag resulted in a small amoum of mean-bed fill and scour.
<br />Transirion from upper to lower flow regimes could produce (he
<br />same effeer in a natural scream with a discontinuous depth versus
<br />velocity telarion, provided that the rate of change of discharge is of
<br />the same order or greater than the rate of change of bed roughness.
<br />Since flow at the field sire was seemingly all in the upper flow re~
<br />gime. this presumably did not occur.
<br />Application of [he antidune-amplitude estimation technique to
<br />the Arroyo de Ios Frijoles in New Mexico shows that Leopold and
<br />orhers' (1966) scour.and.fill dara lor rhe main project reach can be
<br />ocplained as well by bed reworking br antidunes as by mean-bed
<br />scour and fill for flows wirh maximum unit discharges greater than
<br />0.5 mJ/m's. For flows with maximum unit discharges less rhan 0.5
<br />mJ/m's, anridune bed reworking may be masked by dune re-.vorking
<br />during the waning flow. This last effeer is sperulaove since the stage
<br />versus discharge relation for the main projecr reach waS nor re-
<br />ported by rhose authors.
<br />
<br />ACKNOWLEDGMEi'\fTS
<br />
<br />This work ben~rted grearly from discussions and suggeStions by
<br />R. P. Sharp and V. A. Vanoni. [gratefully acknowledge rhe careful
<br />criticisms of the manuscript by V. -R. Baker, W. W. Emmett, and
<br />C. F. Nordin, Jr. Field work in the Los Padres National Forest waS
<br />perloemed wirh rhe permission 01 rhe U,$, Foresr Sel'Vice. Field
<br />work was supported by a research grant from the Geological Soci-
<br />ery of America, laboratory work was supported by grams from rhe
<br />Army Research Office and the National Science Foundation,
<br />
<br />REfERENCES CITED
<br />
<br />Baker. Victor R.. 1973. Paleohydrology Jnd scdimemology of !....;l!.:.~ .\1i:;-
<br />soula Rooding in eascern Washington: Geol. Soc. Amerio Spec. Paper
<br />144,79 p.
<br />
<br />;j
<br />"
<br />
<br />;'!
<br />
<br />"
<br />'I
<br />ili
<br />'I
<br />1.1.
<br />II:
<br />,'.
<br />1,1"
<br />:,Ii
<br />i'll
<br />II:
<br />, I'
<br />d
<br />'I'
<br />ill
<br />II"
<br />, I
<br />, '
<br />',!
<br />'Ii
<br />'II
<br />',II'
<br />I
<br />':1
<br />:j
<br />
<br />i ~
<br />:ii!
<br />:Ii I
<br />1', ,I
<br />:1;,1
<br />
<br />:ilj,
<br />'W:[
<br />fir' I
<br />:II: I
<br />iil :
<br />I' .
<br />:,: I'
<br />,.,
<br />
<br />:iiiii'
<br />.,1111
<br />'I'
<br />i,ll:
<br />II!! !
<br />;llll
<br />'I:; !
<br />" ,
<br />'1_1 i
<br />"1 I
<br />Iii
<br />:-: I
<br />"
<br />j"ll
<br />11, !
<br />
|