My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02951
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02951
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:15:22 AM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:22:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Adams
Denver
Jefferson
Community
State of Colorado
Basin
South Platte
Title
The Foothills Complex - A Commitment to the Future
Date
7/14/1982
Prepared For
State of Colorado
Prepared By
Denver Water Department
Floodplain - Doc Type
Project
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />Foothills Treatment Plant <br /> <br />Nearly thirty years before Foothills Treatment Plant <br />began delivering water to the Denver area, consulting <br />engineers studying Denver's future water development <br />zeroed in on the present Foothills site northeast of <br />Roxborough State Park for a new treatment plant. <br />A 200-acre plant site was purchased in 1956 and surveys <br />made to locate a diversion dam and tunnel to bring <br />South Platte River water to the proposed plant. <br />Following a 1962 application for the dam and tunnel, <br />the U.S. Bureau of Land Management approved the filing <br />in 1967 and granted rights-of-way to the Denver Water <br />Department. <br />Further studies in the '60s and early '70s by the Water <br />Department and consulting engineers considered <br />possible alternatives; sizing of the dam, tunnel and <br />treatment facilities, and costs involved. The present 490- <br />acre plant site was acquired through additional purchases <br />of property. <br />By 1973 Foothills Project consultants were hired to <br />prepare a project Environmental Assessment and to <br />design all phases. <br />In late 1973 Denver voters approved a $160 million <br />bond issue to help finance a $368 million, 12-year capital <br />improvements program. This included $70.2 million to <br />partly finance Foothills construction. <br />Initial construction-an access road in the canyon to <br />the dam site-was halted early in 1974 when the Denver <br />Water Board's right-of-way was questioned under new <br />federal environmental regulations. <br />Following an Environmental Assessment, three <br /> <br />Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) were prepared by <br />federal agencies acting under new laws. <br />These agencies issued necessary rights-of-way for work <br />on federal lands in the spring of 1978. <br />Although no federal money was involved, the impact <br />studies were required because part of the project lies on <br />a few dozen acres of federal land in the South Platte <br />Canyon. Most of the project land is owned by the <br />D.enver Water Board, including all of the plant site and <br />215 acres at the reservoir site. <br />When environmental objections again threatened <br />issuance of a dredge and fill permit, Rep. Tim Wirth (D- <br />Colo) called upon the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to <br />conduct an in-depth technical study to determine the <br />need for the treatment facilities and further evaluate <br />alternatives to proposed construction. Late in 197B the <br />many parties involved in the extended Foothills dispute, <br />including state and federal agencies and environmental <br />groups, were brought together by Wirth. They met in <br />lengthly night meetings to settle the tangled legal issues <br />and adopt mitigations. Federal authorities, finding a <br />justified need and no better alternatives, issued the final <br />permit. Construction of the plant, dam, tunnel and <br />conduit as originally planned and designed got underway <br />the summer of 1979. <br />Foothills was to have been completed in 1977 at an <br />estimated cost of $100 million. Rising inflation during the <br />long delay helped drive costs to an estimated $182 <br />million. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.