My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02918
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02918
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:25:49 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:19:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Denver
Community
Denver
Stream Name
South Platte River
Basin
South Platte
Title
Estimation of Flood Depth-Damage Curves for Residential, Commercial and Industrial Properties in the Denver Region
Date
10/1/1977
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
Wayne J. Grahm (Master of Science Candidate at CSU)
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />projects had to be scraped due to unfavorable benefit-cost ratios? <br /> <br />The author thought that flood damage to a masonry structure might be <br /> <br />less than that to a frame structure of the same value. In conversation <br /> <br />with one of the U.D.&F.C.D. consultants, Sellards and Grigg, it was <br /> <br />learned that they also thought separate curves for masonry and non-masonry <br /> <br />construction should be developed for commercial structures. In order to <br /> <br />make the analysis, the author obtained NFIA flood claim information <br /> <br />for the period of October, 1975 through June, 1977. While this informa- <br /> <br />tion has not been verified by FIA and may contain some errors, it is none- <br /> <br />theless the best information available toFIA on actual flood loss exper- <br /> <br />ience. Tables 5 and 6 show depth-% damage for different types of con- <br /> <br />struction for single family residential and non-residential structures, <br /> <br />respectively. The information on type of construction comes from the <br /> <br />flood insurance application form completed by insurance salesmen and the <br /> <br />information on structure value (actual cash value) and amount of loss comes <br /> <br />from. the Proof of Loss form filled out by insurance adjusters. No clear- <br /> <br />cut pattern emerges on Tables 5 and 6 and the author therefore, concludes <br /> <br />that the type of construction, as indicated in the two tables, is not a <br /> <br />significant factor in computing flood dmages. <br /> <br />The author found that not enough damage data was available within the <br /> <br />Denver region from which depth-damage curves can be developed. Two of the <br /> <br />most likely sources, the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District and <br /> <br />the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District were either contacted by <br /> <br />phone or visited several times during the data gathering stage of this paper. <br /> <br />The author, while working for the Omaha District from 1973 through 1975, <br /> <br />made many attempts to secure damage estimates for individual structures <br /> <br />84 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.