Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I. <br />I <br /> <br />The original intention in developing this paper was to travel to <br /> <br />Arlington, Virginia so that the flood claims on file at the National <br /> <br />Flood Insurors Association (NFIA) could be viewed and analyzed. Because <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />of the conflicts and disagreements that exist between FIA and NFIA, per- <br /> <br />mission was not granted to the author to view the files. Perhaps, after the <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />controversy subsides, or another industry group is chosen to handle the in- <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />surance part of the National Flood Insurance Program, permi.ssion would be <br /> <br />granted to view the files. Information concerning building size and age, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />indications as to velocity and duration, location of the flooding and <br /> <br />types of damages are not now available in any of the reports available to <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />FIA from NFIA but could be determined by looking at individual claims. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Analyzing individual claims would be most beneficial in the establishment <br /> <br />of commercial depth-damage curves, <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />The following analysis of FIA depth-damage curves is based upon the <br /> <br />author's experience working for the FIA for two and one-half years and <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />upon discussions with the flood claims manager and analysis of flood claims <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />on file with the local flood insurance servicing company: CNA. <br /> <br />The Federal Insurance Administration issued a set of depth-damage curves <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />in 1970 and again in 1974 for residential and small business structures and <br /> <br />residential contents. The 1970 depth-damage curves were selected from early <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />flood insurance studies in which FIA's contractors had to develop depth-dam- <br /> <br />age curves for the particular community being studied. Thus, they were not <br /> <br />based on actual losses (in some instances, they probably were, i,e., when <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />a recent damage survey had been undertaken after a flood event) but on the <br /> <br />consultant's estimate of losses that would result from various depths of <br /> <br />~ <br />I <br /> <br />water in various types of buildings. As the number of Flood Insurance <br /> <br />60 <br /> <br />I <br />