Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />E. <br /> <br />D. <br /> <br />STORMW A TER MANAGEMENT MODELING <br /> <br />Delineation of Subwatersheds <br /> <br />TC&B created three hydrologic scenarios: the Base Model, Futurc Model, and Existing Model. <br />Each 0 f thcsc scenarios is described below. <br /> <br />A total of 168 subwatersheds were delineated for the First Creek and DFA 0055 study area. The <br />sub watershed identification and locations arc displayed in Appendix C. <br /> <br />The Base Model is the master planned drainage system, with master.planned detention facilities, and <br />the future land.use condition. It incorporates the MartinIMartin model with minor modifications, <br />noted earlier. It represents the master plan upstream from the RMA. The results from this modeling <br />scenario identify thc peak flows and detention volumes along the First Creek mainstem and <br />tributaries when the watershed is fully developed and the master planned upstream drainage system <br />is in place. The Base Model flow rates that are shown in this report represent the effects of the <br />drainage system plan that the sponsors selected for implementation within the study area. <br /> <br />The two. foot contour mapping, provided by Adams County and RMA, was uscd to verify <br />subwatershed boundaries. Field inspections were made to verify flow paths and boundaries. The <br />subwatersheds rangc in sizc from 6.4 acres to 717 acres. <br /> <br />Minor changes were made to the watershed delineation used in the WWE study to conform to the 2. <br />foot contour mapping provided. <br /> <br />Imperviousness <br /> <br />The Future Model is the existing drainage system, existing detention facilities, and the future land- <br />use condition. The results from this modeling scenario identify the peak flows and detention <br />volumes along the First Creek mainstem and tributaries when the watershed is fully developed and <br />the drainage system is in its current configuration. <br /> <br />The watershed imperviousness was determined for the futurc land use and the existing land use <br />conditions. Zoning information, provided by Commerce City (Reference 15 & 16) and Adams <br />County (Reference 17 & 18), was used to identify levels of imperviousness. Landiscor Aerial <br />Photographs 1998/1999 were used to identify the existing land use for the First Creek watershed <br />(Reference 2). Changes were made to reflect the existing percent imperviousness from the aerial <br />photographs. The range of the imperviousness was betwcen 2 and 90 percent. <br /> <br />The Existing Model is the existing drainage system, existing detention facilities, and the existing <br />land-use condition. The results from this modeling scenario identify the peak flows and detention <br />volumes along the First Creek mainstem and tributaries with the watershed at the current level of <br />urban development and the drainage system in its current configuration. For the existing drainagc <br />system, TC&B revised the future drainage system file to reflect the existing condition throughout the <br />watershed. All proposed detention elemcnts, except those that have been constructed, were removed <br />from the model. The existing condition channels from the WWE UDSWM model wcre used as the <br />basis for these revisions. <br /> <br />For the future imperviousness within the study area, there werc thrce locations that had been rczoned <br />from commercial to residential, which reduced the previous percent impervious from 85 to 50 <br />percent. Within the RMA, two sites had been designated as commercial/industrial. One site has <br />been removed and restored to open space, and the other site's area has been reduced by <br />approximately onc-half. <br /> <br />The UDFCD's Colorado Urban Hydrograph Procedure (CUHP F95) model was used to develop <br />runoff hydro graphs for each subwatershed. The runoff hydrographs were routed through the existing <br />stream nctwork using UDFCD's Storm Water Management Model (UDSWM 95). <br /> <br />A map illustrating imperviousness for future and existing land use conditions is shown in Appendix <br />C. <br /> <br />Slope <br /> <br />CUHP MODELING <br /> <br />The slopes for each subwatershed were estimated according to the weighted slope method <br />documented in the USDCM. The length of each subwatershed was broken up into small segments. <br />The slope of each of the segments was computed and correctcd according to Figure 4-1 of the <br />Runoff chapter of the USDCM (Referencc 4). The segment lengths and corrected slopes were <br />entered into Equation 4.5 of the Runoff chapter of the USDCM (Referencc 4) to determine the <br />weighted subwatershed slope. <br /> <br />CUHP models were developed for each subwatershcd to estimate the existing and future hydrology <br />for Lower First Creek and its tributaries. The design storms described in Section C were modeled in <br />each CUHP model. The subwatershed characteristics required for the CUHP models included the <br />identification number, area, length, centroid length, slope, impervious percentage, retention storage <br />losses, and infiltration losses. The methods for estimating the subwatershed characteristics are <br />described below. Table 111-3 and Table 111-4 present the CUHP input data for existing and future <br />land use conditions, respectively. <br /> <br />- 14- <br />