Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />STUDY AUTHORIZATION AND PARTICIPATION <br /> <br />The Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD), in joint sponsorship with Adams County <br />and Commerce City, contracted with Turner Collie & Braden Inc. (TC&B) for engineering services <br />for an Outfall Systems Planning Study for the Lower First Creek and Direct Flow Area 0055 (DF A <br />0055) watersheds. The study area is shown in Figure 1-1. A map showing the jurisdictional <br />boundaries within the area can be found in Map 5 of 24 in Appendix C ofthis report. Specific <br />project tasks for this study were performed in accordance with UOFCD Agreement Number 99- <br />03.09. <br /> <br />The overall study is divided into three components. The first eomponent (Phase I) discusses the <br />hydrological, hydraulic, and alternative evaluation aspects of the study. The Phase 1 report was <br />finalized on November 2000 (Reference 22). The second part (phase II) covers the preliminary <br />design of the selected alternative. This report is being prepared to complete the Phase Hcomponent <br />of the study. The final component is the Flood Hazard Area Delineation, which was submitted <br />September 2001 (Reference 23). In addition, the Hydrology Report (Reference 24), summarized in <br />this report, was finalized on February 2000. <br /> <br />Representatives of the project sponsors reviewed the progress of the study on a routine basis and <br />provided input and guidance throughout the study. The list of lead representatives is presented in the <br />Acknowledgements section at the front of this report. <br /> <br />PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES <br /> <br />An Outfall Systems Master Plan (master plan) was prepared for First Creek and DFA 0055 in 1990 <br />by Wright Water Engineers. In 1998, MartinIMartin revised the master plan in the Gateway area <br />from Picadilly Road to Buckley Road. The revised master plan proposed several smaller detention <br />basins in the Gateway area, in lieu of the Bald Eagle detention pond that was proposed in the <br />original master plan. <br /> <br />The purpose of this study is to update the master plan for the Lower First Creek watershed to reflect <br />anticipated development and to factor in the master plan revision that has been adopted upstream of <br />Pena Boulevard. Additionally, the intermediate goals that are required to complete the update are: to <br />analyze the existing and future drainage patterns in the lower First Creek watershed; identify <br />drainage problems; develop and evaluate alternatives to alleviate the problems; and prepare a <br />preliminary design for the alternative selected by the project sponsors. <br /> <br />The general scope of the Outfall Systems Planning Phase II part of the study is as follows: <br /> <br />1. Evaluate the alternative selected by the sponsors. <br /> <br />D. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />Update the hydrologic and hydraulic aspects of the drainage area to reflect the drainage <br />improvements selected by the project sponsors. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Prepare a preliminary design of the selected drainage improvements including plans, profiles, <br />and details of said improvements. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Prepare a detailed cost estimate for the selected drainage improvements. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />Provide a discussion on prioritization of the selected drainage improvements. <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />Present in a written Phase II report, a summary of the study's analysis, discussions, results <br />and the improvements selected to address the drainage problems identified in the Phase 1 <br />report. <br /> <br />C. <br /> <br />ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF DESIGN CRITERIA <br /> <br />The Outfall Systems Planning and Flood Hazard Area Delineation were performed according to the <br />terms of the contract and the guidelines and criteria set forth in the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria <br />Manual (UDSDCM) (Reference 4). The storm drainage design and technical criteria of the various <br />project sponsors were also utilized. <br /> <br />A number ofUOFCD hydrologic evaluations have been completed for the First Creek watershed. <br />TC&B used these evaluations as the foundation to develop a complete hydrologic model for the <br />watershed. The previous evaluations were reviewed and the appropriate Colorado Urban <br />Hydrograph Procedure (CUHP) and Urban Drainage Stormwater Management Model (UDSWM) <br />computer models were obtained. TC&B used these models to develop the hydrology for the lower <br />First Creek watershed. <br /> <br />PROJECT HISTORY AND CORRESPONDENCE <br /> <br />Project meetings were held to discuss various aspects of the study, to gather information and <br />guidance from the sponsors, and to present and discuss results developed during the process of <br />completing the study. A project advisory committee was formed at the onset of the study. In <br />addition to the project sponsors, the following organizations were notified of the project, invited to <br />public meetings, and received meeting minutes: Colorado Water Conservation Board, Federal <br />Emergency Management Agency, Colorado State Land Board, Central Colorado Water Conservancy <br />District, Colorado Department of Transportation, Henrylyn Irrigation District, North Front Range <br />Water Quality Planning Association, Soil Conservation Service, Colorado Division of Wildlife, U.S. <br />Army Corps of Engineers, Colorado Water Quality Control Division, U.S. Environmental Protection <br />Agency, and Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company. <br /> <br />A summary of the project meetings held during the Phase I part of the study was included in the <br />Alternatives Report (Reference 22). There were a total of five (5) progress meetings held after the <br /> <br />. I - <br />