My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02879
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02879
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:25:42 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:17:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Water Project Construction Loan Program
Date
8/1/1994
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />c. Task Products - A description Jf the specific outputs associated with the <br />completion of the task. <br /> <br />A study schedule and budget should bembmitted as a plII': of the SP. The schedule <br />should show the amount of time required fJr each major task and the total amount of time <br />required for the entire study as well as the estimated dates for meetings and submittals. <br />The budget should provide a cost estimate for the entire study and for each study task. <br /> <br />2.2.3 Coordination Activities <br /> <br />Most planning studies will require certain coordination activities between the project <br />sponsor, the study consultant, the CWCB staff, and other organizations and individuals <br />who have an interest in the: outcome of the study. Coordlim:tion activities may involve <br />progress report>, meetings, workshops, newsletters, summary reports, and advisory <br />committees. The CWCB staff will assist the project sponsor and the consultant in <br />developing a schedule of coordination activities appropriate for each particular study. <br /> <br />In general, the more compn~hensive studies (such as reconnaissance studies) will require <br />a greater range of coordination activities. A feasibility study with a very limited scope, <br />on the other hand, may entail only progress reports and :m occasional meeting. <br /> <br />2.2.4 Formulation of Alternati'l'es <br /> <br />All studies funded wholly or in part by he CWCB should include the fonnulation and <br />evaluation of a reasonable number of alternatives for accomplishing the study objective(s). <br />The number of alternatives will depend upon the scope of the study; reconnaissance <br />studies will generally entail a greater num ber of alternatives than feasibility studies. <br /> <br />Alternatives should be deve:loped using bcth structural and non-structural elements in an <br />attempt to identify the least costly combination of measurl~s for achieving the study <br />objective. Examples of stI1lctural elemenls are storage reservoirs, canals, and pipelines. <br />Examples of non-structural elements are improvements in the management of <br />developed water supplies, water transfers from existing to new uses and new or revised <br />institutional arrangements. <br /> <br />Each planning study prepar,ed for the CWCB must include: at least one alternative which <br />incorporates non-structural measures. Where non-structural measures are inappropriate <br />for accomplishing the study objective(s), the study report should so state and provide an <br />explanation. <br /> <br />2.2.5 Description of Alternatives <br /> <br />Each alternative should be described in terms of its various (:omponents (both structural <br />and non-structural) and the manner in which the proposed facility will operate. The <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.