Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br />DARlES C. LILE <br />DIRECTOR <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />June 9, 1998 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Jeff Brugink - U.S. Forest Service <br />Greg O'Neill - U.S. Geological Survey <br />Judy Peratt - Jefferson County OEM <br />Pat Rogers - Colorado Geological Survey <br />Fred Sibley - Colorado OEM <br />Kevin Stewart - Urban Drainage and Flood Control District <br />Michael Vanatta - Jefferson County Highways and Transportation <br />Page Whitesides - Buffalo Creek Association <br />District Chief - North Fork Fire Protection District <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Tom Browning - Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Bob Jarrett - U.S. Geological Survey <br />Larry Tunnel- National Weather Service <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />Buffalo Creek Annual Watershed Inspection <br /> <br />On May 19, 1998, a field visit/watershed inspection of the Buffalo Creek area was <br />performed by Bob Jarrett (USGS), Larry Tunnell (NWS), and Tom Browning (CWCB). <br />The purposes of the trip were to: I) Assess the current vegetative/soil conditions of the <br />burned watershed in order to estimate the hydrologic response characteristics prior to the <br />1998 rainstorm flood season, 2) Obtain additional cross-section information for <br />verification discharge estimates, 3) Obtained a cross-section at the new streamflow <br />gaging station on Buffalo Creek dls ofhwy 126 to help develop a rating curve, and 4) To <br />assist the NWS with precipitation thresholds for flash flood watches and warnings for the <br />residents ofthe Buffalo Creek vicinity. <br /> <br />A summary offmdings based on the field visit is as follows: <br /> <br />. Grasses, leafy plants, and some small shrubs have begun growing in most of the <br />burned areas, but very spotty. The density and coverage of the new vegetation varies <br />largely based on topography, soils, and Forest Service actions. The south facing <br />slopes seem to have very little vegetation as compared to the north facing slopes. <br />There does not seem to be enough vegetation to reduce water and soil runoff as <br />compared to 1996 and 1997. Growth of new Ponderosa Pine forests has not begun at <br />this time. <br />