Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />In Reach 1, the implementation of the recommended plan would transpire in es- <br />sentially two stages. The initial stage calls for a 2-year grass lined channel with design <br />flows that are substantially reduced as a result of utilizing proposed upstream detention <br />improvements. The predominantly agricultura.11and use in Reach 1 does not substantiate a <br />larger channel due to the relatively low amount of probable flood damage. But the <br />absence of an established wasteway through this Reach necessitates the construction of a <br />formal channel to convey storm waters and allevia.te much of the damages that are <br />sustained during the higher frequency storm$. Regulation of the residual floodplain in <br />Reach 1 gives rise to the final phase of the plan. It is floodplain regulation which would <br />prevent the unwise development in the floodplain or would require adequate <br />channelization through any future development to safely convey flows through the reach <br />without increasing the probable flood damage. A floodway adequate to convey the 100- <br />year flood then becomes the final stage of tpe plan, with its construction a condition of <br />the development of adjacent lands. A flow separation structure is recommended where <br />the improved channel is to cross the Lower Clear Creek Canal, precluding the entry of <br />unwanted storm waters into the canal during the design flood. Right-of-way acquisition <br />and an access trail, which is to be constructed alongside the improved channel to provide <br />for economical and regular maintenance, are both necessary parts of the plan. <br /> <br />The recommendations for Reach 2 are similar to those of Reach 1. Specifically, <br />the construction of a 2-year grass channel Which is to be enlarged as a condition of the <br />future development of adjacent lands to convey the 100-year runoff, right-of-way <br />acquisition, and access trail construction. A 21 inch RCP was recently placed through the <br />entire length of Reach 2 as a temporary measure to alleviate various problems associated <br />with the constant base flow that has developed as a result of the subsurface drains and <br />lawn irrigation return flows that discharge into the drainage way. Field observations <br />indicate that this pipe is of sufficient size to accommodate outflow from the 18 inch RCP <br />beneath the Holly Street embankment situated immediately upstream. Since the total <br />improved detention volume upstream of Holly Street is slightly less than the 10-year <br />runoff volume, it is feasible at this juncture of the study to consider utilizing the 21 inch <br />RCP to convey runoff through Reach 2 from at least the 2-year storm. In either case, a . <br />formal right-of-way or maintenance easement is necessary to gain access to the improved <br />drainage channel and/or low flow pipe, The culvert beneath Riverdale Road will have to <br />be enlarged to pass the 10-year runoff, as required by Adams County, -to prevent any of <br />the initial design runoff from overtopping the road. <br /> <br />In Reach 3, proposed drainage way improvements are bounded by existing right-of- <br />way limits. The recommended plan in the upper half of the Reach calls for a 100-year <br />concrete lined channel that would extend from East 112th Avenue downstream for roughly <br />650 feet following the existing 30 foot wide right-of-way. In the lower half of the Reach, <br />two existing detention ponds are to be modified to better reduce flood peaks downstream <br />and to provide protection of pond embankments from larger floods. This would involve <br />enlarging the storage capacity of the Upper Medema Pond from the existing 4 acre feet to <br />approximately 16 acre feet, augmenting the existing storage capacity of 7 acre feet of the <br />Lower Medema Pond. In addition, the spillway of the Upper Pond is to be improved to <br />convey the 100-year flood and the flow rate of the outlet pipe is to be reduced to that of <br />the Lower Pond, assuring full utilization of its storage prior to filling the Lower Pond. <br />Finally, a spillway, designed to pass the 100-year flood, should be constructed and <br />protection provided on the Lower Pond embankment. This will include relocating the <br />Colorado Agricultural Canal to the East of Holly Street, thereby preventing the entry of <br />silt laden storm runoff into the Canal and rendering it inoperable. The narrow gorge <br />formed by the downstream face of the Lower Medema Pond and the upstream face of the <br />Holly Street embankment will then serve to collect spillway overflow from the Lower <br />Pond and funnel flow beneath Holly Street through new culverts, see Fig. 1-2. <br /> <br />1-2 <br />