Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />5.2.2 Assumptions <br /> <br />A number of assumptions were made during the conceptual alternative stage. These included: <br /> <br />. Use of the 100-year discharge for design. <br /> <br />. Improvements from the U.S. 40 bridge upstream will be coordinated to avoid generating <br />some type of system-wide instability. <br /> <br />. The U.S. 40 bridge will be protected, and will act as a grade control for the reaches <br />immediately upstream. <br /> <br />. Some excavation of the two large point bars that exist immediately upstream of U.S. 40 <br />and opposite the sharp bend would take place. <br /> <br />5.2.3 Bed Stability Measures <br /> <br />Several alternative measures are available for stabilizing the channel bed. These measures <br />include drop structures, grade control, or channel armoring, and would be used to reduce or <br />limit the amount of erosion or degradation of the channel bed. Drop structures are used to <br />effectively reduce slopes by providing energy dissipation along steep reaches that have high <br />erosion potential. Grade control structures include construction of a hard point or sill that will <br />effectively resist erosive forces and control the grade or control of the channel bed. These <br />structures may be used to limit headcut migration upstream, or maintain the grade of a channel <br />experiencing degradation. <br /> <br />Two types of grade control structures were considered for this study. The first is a pre-formed <br />boulder grade control that would extend across the channel and into the adjacent bank a <br />distance of 20 ft. This concept is illustrated in Figure 5.1. It anticipates that the channel bed <br />will degrade as much as 2 ft. Boulders would provide the drop with a plug of smaller (Type M) <br />riprap across the front to protect against scour, and provide the opportunity for some habitat <br />development while providing armor protection. The structure would be pre-formed, and could <br />either be backfilled, or left to fill in naturally. This would allow the existing channel bed to <br />flatten to around 0.004ftJft through this reach. <br /> <br />The second grade control concept is a riprap grade control, and is illustrated in Figure 5.2. This <br />concept provides a trench across the channel that is filled with a riprap volume adequate to <br />protect against anticipated degradation and local scour. This measure relies on the natural <br />degradation processes to launch the stone as needed for protection of the bed. <br /> <br />It is anticipated that some type of grade control will be necessary upstream of the sharp <br />meander bend between Sections 5 and 6. This would provide protection for the upstream area <br />by maintaining the bed elevation and help guard against mass bank failure that could result <br />from significant channel degradation. Copies of backup calculations for the grade control <br />measures are included in Appendix J. <br /> <br />30 <br />