My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02750
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02750
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2009 11:49:02 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:06:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Watershed Protection
Document ID
125
County
Routt
Stream Name
Elk River
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Title
Streambank Stabilization Limited Watershed
Date
11/1/1999
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
ICON Engineering, Inc.
Watershed Pro - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />A second calibration model was created. In this model, Manning's 'n' values were changed to <br />0.035 for the channel and 0.05 for the immediate overbanks in Sections 4 and 5. The <br />contraction and expansion coefficients at the U.S. 40 and railroad bridges were also increased <br />to 0.3 and 0.5. Water surface elevations from this model are within 0.7 feet of the high water <br />mark for Section 6, and within 0.4 feet of the high water marks for Sections 3, 4, and 5. This <br />second model did not correlate well with the composite rating curve developed to determine <br />overflows to the West Fork. Therefore, it was only used to provide a range of possible <br />overflows to the West Fork. <br /> <br />Results of the calibration efforts indicate that between 470 cfs and 1670 cfs may have spilled <br />from the west bank of the Elk River during the June 1997 flood event. Since the first <br />calibration model provides a more conservative estimate of depth and velocities for stability <br />consideration, and since it correlates with the rating curve for the overflows to the West Fork, it <br />was used as the base model for all other storm events. A summary of the results is shown in <br />Table 3.3. Copies of the HEC-RAS output for the multiple profile and calibration models are <br />provided in Appendices G and H, respectively. The resulting 100-year water surface profile is <br />shown in Figure 3.4. <br /> <br />Table 3.3 - Summary of Hydraulic Analysis Results <br /> Discharge Elevation Avg. Velocity Comments <br />River Station (cfs) (ft) (ft/sec) <br />0.5 4360.0 6528.0 6.0 5-year <br /> 5635.0 6528.5 6.6 100-year <br /> 6130.0 6528.7 6.8 500-year <br /> 4900.0 6528.2 6.2 June 1997 <br /> 500.0 6525.5 2.6 Low Flow <br />1.0 4360.0 6529.1 6.0 5-year <br /> 5635.0 6529.7 6.7 100-year <br /> 6130.0 6529.9 6.9 500-year <br /> 4900.0 6529.4 6.3 June 1997 <br /> 500.0 6526.7 2.6 Low Flow <br />2.0 4360 6530.22 7.39 5-year <br /> 5635.0 6530.9 8.3 100-year <br /> 6130.0 6531.1 8.6 500-year <br /> 4900.0 6530.4 7.9 June 1997 <br /> 500.0 6527.0 2.9 Low Flow <br />3.0 4360.0 6531.3 8.0 5-year <br /> 5635.0 6532.1 8.9 1 OO-yea r <br /> 6130.0 3532.3 9.2 500-yea r <br /> 4900.0 6531.6 8.5 June 1997 <br /> 500.0 6527.9 2.9 Low Flow <br /> <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.