My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02685
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02685
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:25:10 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:04:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Larimer
Basin
South Platte
Title
Flood Geomorphology of Arthurs Rock Gulch: Paleoflood History
Date
1/1/1994
Prepared For
Larimer County
Prepared By
Elsevier Science Publishers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />30 <br /> <br />...<..--".-' ;,.--.'...:........~.. _." <br /> <br />C.F. Way/homos. R.D. Jarrett/Geomo'Pholagy 11 (/994) /5-40 <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />STRATIGRAPHY ~ DESCRIPTION AND RADIOCARBON DATES <br /> <br />FB3 <br /> <br /> <br />B <br /> <br />VERTICAL SCALE, <br />lNCENTDoIETERS <br /> <br />t: <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />Ught brown, pebbly gravel, well sorted. clast <br />SUPPOl1ed, composed of >90% pegmatite dasts. 10- <br />14cmthick. <br />465;; 160 yr. BP (GX"5640) <br />Dark brown. silty sand \0 sandy silt with <br />disseminated organic detritus. charcoal and wood. <br />Matrix~supponed. granule.. and pebble-sized clasts <br />comprise abolJl 10'"10 of unit. near toP. about' 40 c;m <br />thick. <br />240;; 170 yr. BP(GX.15641) <br /> <br />.. .. __u...____ Uncontonnfty? <br />~~ ~ L Orange-brown. sandy silt with minor granules and <br />7 ~ '7 7 pebbles. and few wOOd lragmems and charcoal, <br />l' - .. thickness unknown. Unit may overlie FB2. <br /> <br />4,320;; 225 yr. 8P (GX'l5643) <br /> <br />Fig. 8. Measured section and radiocarbon ages, site 1. Location of section given in Fig. Sa. <br /> <br />5.3, Sire 3 <br /> <br />Site 3 covers a reach of channel about 90 m long, <br />and is located about 0.8 km upstream from Horsetooth <br />Reservoir (Fig. 2). Erosional terraces mantled by flood <br />boulders are inset within a low-relief, eastward-sloping <br />colluvial apron that mantles the underlying bedrock <br />(Fig. 5b). FBO boulders at Site 3 (and Site 4) are the <br />highest and oldest flood deposits in the lower part of <br />the basin. The boulders lie on an old alluvial surface <br />(TO, Fig, 5b) that is cut into the colluvial apron. FBO <br />deposits are easily differentiated from all younger <br />deposits by their position above the active channel and <br />weathering characteristics (Fig. 7; Table 2). <br />FE I deposits are present on the outer portion of the <br />TI terrace at or just above the break in slope denning <br />the terrace riser about 0.9 to I m below the FBO deposits <br />(Fig. 5b). Natural exposures through the TI terrace <br />show up to I m of coarse gravel and boulders on top of <br />fine-grained colluvial deposits and bedrock. A mature <br />soil with a thick Bt horizon has formed on the TI terrace <br />alluvium and underlying colluvial deposits. The Bt <br />horizon is 20 cm to more than I m thick, exhibits 75YR <br />3/4 colors. and contains 13-36% clay relative to one <br />sample of oxidized alluvium containing about 3% clay <br />(Table 3). Because Arthurs Rock Gulch is located in <br />a state park. there were liinited opportunities to exca- <br />vate deep trenches to obtain soil data from the C-hori- <br />zon. In some locations the alluvial deposits are thin and <br /> <br />the B-horizon extends to bedrock. Although data from <br />unweathered parent material is lacking the amount of <br />clay and color of the B-horizon of soils developed on <br />the TI terrace indicates that the terrace is at least of <br />Holocene age or older, but probably not older than <br />middle Pleistocene age. Soil chrono-stratigraphic stud- <br />ies in the Colorado Front Range indicate that surficial <br />deposits with soil B-horizons comparable to that <br />described above are probably at least 100,000 years old <br />(Shroba and Birkeland, 1983; Birkeland, 1984). How. <br />ever, the lack of data on C-horizon characteristics for <br />the soils developed on the Tl terrace limit age esti- <br />. mates. <br />The weathering characteristics of both FBO and FB I <br />deposits are similar to those recorded for erratic boul- <br />ders on late Pleistocene (Pinedale) moraines in the <br />Colo~do Rocky Mountains (Birkeland, 1973, 1984; <br />Madole, 1976): As discussed previously, spalling of <br />boulder sutfaces may occur following a forest fire, and <br />the degree of boulder weathering could record the time <br />since the last episode of spalling induced by fire. <br />Although FBO and FB I deposits may be correlative <br />with ca. 40.000 year old Pinedale age erratic boulders, <br />the degree of weathering on FBO and FB 1 boulders <br />may not indicate the time since deposition because of <br />the possible effects of fire. Thus. FBO and FB I deposits <br />could be older than 40,000 yr SP. <br />FE2 deposits consist of clusters of imbricategrano- <br />diorite and pegmatite clasts that are ] to 2.8 m above <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />Table 3- <br />Field. an <br /> <br />Location <br /> <br />Tl (erraCt <br />Site 3 <br /> <br />TI [t:rr.aCt <br />Site) <br /> <br />Tllerrac~ <br />$ite4 <br /> <br />T3[erra~. <br />Site 4 <br /> <br />Colluvial s <br />SiteS <br /> <br />aSoiI borize <br />~unsen S, <br />.CU:ssthan: <br /> <br />the acti VI <br />along the <br />riser (Fj~ <br />long dime <br />ne!. FB2 ( <br />FBlorFI <br />FB3 fle <br />limited in <br />about I r. <br />deposits a <br />FB4 de <br />atSite3.F <br />channel aT <br />deposits c <br />centration: <br />matite anc <br />rarely pres <br />erate flood <br />boulder fl1 <br /> <br />h f/~'?,~' i-~ . _ ~~",___;../:~~:' <br /> <br />"--': <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.