Laserfiche WebLink
<br />HYDROLOGY <br /> <br />ORIGINAL STUDY <br /> <br />The hydrology and subsequent flow rates for this basin have been <br />obtained from a 1977 study by Wright-McLaughlin Engineers titled <br />"Ralston/Leyden Creek Major Drainageway Planning". The purpose of <br />their study was to create a master plan for flood hazard management <br />for Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. <br /> <br />Due to the complex nature of the drainage basin tributary to <br />Ralston/Leyden Creeks and the extensive hydrological evaluations <br />necessary, the method used to compute runoff was a mathematical <br />model known as the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Catchment <br />Model or MITCAT. At the time the MITCAT model was known to be more <br />.sensitive to urbanization, channelization and reservoir variables <br />than other commonly used methods. <br /> <br />Flow estimates for the 100 year event under the 1977 conditions are <br />presented in Table 111-1 for all of the Ralston Creek Basin. The <br />location of the site under study is Ralston Creek above Leyden <br />Creek. <br /> <br />Flow estimates for the 100 year event under future conditions are <br />presented in Table 111-2. These values are based upon future <br />development with the existing channel and include routing the flood <br />through Ralston Reservoir and Leyden Lake. The 100 year floodplain <br />was determined assuming that Blunn Reservoir was not in place. <br />However, Blunn Reservoir is in place and is a integral part of the <br />flood management program. It was found through hydraulic analysis <br />and routing that Blunn Reservoir has a negligible effect on the <br />peak flows of Ralston Creek. It was also assumed that all <br />reservoirs are full at the time of the design storm, resulting in <br />only that storage which would take place above the spillway crests. <br />Land use patterns were based upon the latest plans approved by the <br />City of Arvada and Jefferson County. These land use plans <br />forecasted medium to low development densities in the study area. <br />Since the publishing of the 1977 study, very little development has <br />actually occured and today the area is still agricultural land. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Flow estimates were never developed for the 500 year event. The <br />latest Flood Insurance Rate Map of the area does not include a Zone <br />B for the 500 year flood boundary. The last flood hazard boundary <br />map revision was published on July 5, 1977. <br /> <br />Once the flood magnitudes were determined for the future <br />conditions, the floodplain was developed. The procedure for <br />determining the floodplain was the HEC-2 backwater program <br />developed by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. The majority of the <br />information used to determine the channel cross sections was <br />obtained by a 100 scale aerial topographic map of the area and <br />surveyed culvert information. <br /> <br />. <br />