My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02638
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02638
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:25:01 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:01:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Montrose
Community
Montrose
Stream Name
Uncompahgre River
Basin
Gunnison
Title
Montrose Flood Control and Drainage Plan
Date
3/1/1981
Prepared For
Montrose
Prepared By
Gingery Associates, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />HY D[<9LO(~Y_ <br /> <br />Peak Dischar~ <br />Flood discharges for the major drainageways in this report were obtained <br />fmm a report compl eted in Apri 1, 1979 by Hydm- Tri ad, L td., (Reference 1). <br />As a part of that previous study, runoff hydrographs were developed using <br />;'fv~wJl <br />the Soil Conservation Servi ce procedure for -each sub..bas in;: The hydrographs <br /> <br />were then combined using Muskingum routing to yield discharges for Montrose <br /> <br />Arroyo, Cedar Creek and Dry Cedar Creek. <br /> <br />Ditch cmssings in the study basin, with the exception of the South <br />Cf..'" </~- <br />Canal, were-iiafldlcd b:f ossumi1'l!j-t-ltem to be flowing full at times of flood <br />such that tributary runoff would flow across unimpeded. The South Canal, <br /> <br />because of its large capacity and safe operating record was assumed to <br />collect runoff draining directly into -it and convey it out of the basin. <br /> <br />The impact of snowmelt runoff was eva 1 ua ted and determi ned to be <br /> <br />significant only for the higher frequency events. The dischilY'ges in Tabl e <br /> <br />5 include the effects of rainfall and snowmelt runoff. <br /> <br />Urban Hydrology <br /> <br />As part of the previous study, peak di,'charges were determined for <br /> <br /> <br />each of the local urban sub-basins. These discharges were calculated <br /> <br />using the rational formula and rainfall data kept by the National Weather <br />Service, (Reference 3) and the Uncompahgre Valley Water Users Association, <br /> <br />(Reference 4). <br /> <br />The peak discharges calculated fat' the local urban areas were routed <br />and combi ned by Gi ngery Associ ates to determi ne the effect of urban dra i n- <br />age on the study streams. The individual urban sub-basins were combined <br /> <br />by 1 aggi ng the hydro graphs of upper bas ins to account for travel time to <br /> <br />the lower areas, then adding the hydr09raphs. The results are summarized <br /> <br />in Table 6. It should be noted that the urban runoff is of short duration <br /> <br />and w-ill have subsided before the upstream peak flows reach the city. <br /> <br />- 17 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.