Laserfiche WebLink
<br />[--;-~~~'~TA nON-] <br />STATISTICS <br /> <br />-~~- <br /> <br />YES ,~'STATlON. ~ <br />. ~~::/7=.1__ <br />\ [(~~~~~~~J <br /> <br />N="oRWI nON <br />RECORD APPEr-DIX 7 SEE PAGE 12-;) <br /> <br />, :=1:- <br />[:=g <br />~3"'" <br /><~. <br />G~~~A .J <br />&- <br /> <br />NO <br /> <br />APPENDIX 7 <br />(Reference 4) <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />ZERO Fl..OOO <br />OR <br />INCOMPlETE RECORD <br /> <br />SEE APf'EmJ)( 5. <br />COr-DITIONAL <br />PROBABIIJTY <br />AOJJST'-ENT,FOR <br />OlJTUERS SEE <br />PAGES rr TO t9 <br />Am ApPEtQX <br />SAt>IJ 6 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />COMPUTE ExTEt>.OED <br /> <br /> <br />TEST JoKJ AO.lJST <br />FOR HGli OU11JERSI <br />HISTORIC H'oRMA TlON <br />Appe;mD( 6 <br /> <br />* IF SYSTEMATIC RECORD LENGTH IS <br />LESS THAN 50 YEARS THE ANALYST <br />SHOULD CONSIDER WHETHER THE <br />USE OF THE PROCEDURES OF <br />APPENDIX 7 IS APPROPRIATE, <br /> <br />NOTE: IS FtRnt:;R ANAL YSJS WARRANTED' <br /> <br />STEPS TO THS POINT ARE BASIC <br />STEPS RECUREO IN AN<\L YSlS Of' <br />READILY AVAIlABLE STATION Am <br />HISTORIC DATA. AT ms POINT A <br />DECISION SHQt.U) BE MADE AS TO <br />WHETHER FtJT\JRE FURTHER REFI""- <br />MENT OF mE FRE~NCY ESTlMATF <br />IS ..uSTlF'IEO. TIi1S DECISION 'NIlL <br />DEPEN> 80TH UPON TlM:: Am <br />EFFORT REOORED FOR REFlf"EMENT <br />AN:> UPON nE PURPOSE OF THE <br />FR[()tXNCY ESTIMATE. <br /> <br />COMN..E TE ReCORe' <br /> <br /> <br />IL.._ <br /> <br />FLOOO ESTlMA TEB <br />OM PRECIPITATI <br />SEE PAGES 21-22 <br /> <br />'tL..- <br /> <br />COMPARISONS] <br />WITH $lMlLAR <br />WA TERSHf.OS <br />APPE~rx e <br />r- <br /> <br />.- <br /> <br />C::AL~'J <br />--L' <br />[~ESlnEO ] <br />~L-1 .1- <br />COMPUTE CQMF'lIT! I <br />_ _ EXPECTED <br />CONl.IOENCf. PROIlABIUTY <br />LIMITS AO,J.I$T/.IE:NT <br />APP'Ef\Orx ~l ~pPf:f'{)rx II <br /> <br />FLOW DIAGRAM FOR FLOOD FLOW FREQUENCY ANALYSIS <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />12-2 <br /> <br />7-1 <br />