Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />what proportion of available state funding should be <br />'- . <br />devoted to the repair and teha,ilitatlon of existing <br />systems (especially reservoirs) and to increasing the <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />..- <br /> <br />reliability of existing supplies against drought versus the <br /> <br />construction of projects which will develop new water <br /> <br />supplies? <br />(3) Should the law be amended to permit grants from the <br /> <br />CWCB construction fund and/or to permit loans for 100 <br /> <br />percent of a project's cost in the case of irrigation <br />projects and small municipal water supply systems? <br /> <br />(4) Should state funding be made available for the first <br /> <br />time to assist with major Front Range municipal water <br /> <br />supply projects? If so. should state funding be used only <br /> <br />for the cost of environmental mitigation and pUblic <br /> <br />recreation? <br /> <br />(6) What role should improved efficiency of use and <br /> <br />"better management" of the State's water resources play in <br /> <br />the future? <br /> <br />(7) In light of the answers to the above questions. how <br /> <br />much funding is needed. when. and from what tax revenue <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />sources'should it be derived? <br /> <br />Summary <br /> <br />(To be completed in next draft) <br /> <br />-10- <br />