Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />(1) Irrigation and flood control projects. for which <br />- . <br />Colorado trad-itionally relied u\,on feaeral funding. are not, ., <br /> <br />financially feasible absent governmental subsidies. and <br /> <br />--~ <br /> <br />even with governmental support irrigation projects may <br /> <br />still not be viable because farmers may not be able to <br /> <br />afford the necessary on-farm improvements to use the water <br /> <br />supply. <br /> <br />(2) Except for new municipal demands in the metropolitan <br /> <br />Front Range area. future new water uses are largely <br /> <br /> <br />indeterminate at this time and are therefore very difficult <br /> <br />to project. <br />(3) As a corollary to (2). storage projects built in <br /> <br />anticipation of yet-to-be-identified uses for new water <br />supplies run the risk. because of the great uncertainty of <br /> <br />not knowing where and when water will be needed in the <br /> <br />future. of being improperly located or to tying up scarce <br /> <br />financial resources earlier than may be desirable. <br /> <br />(4) At the same time. however. important potential <br /> <br />reservoir sites are being or could be lost to land <br /> <br />development. thus foreclosing their future use for water <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />storage ~rojects. <br /> <br />(5) Colorado's compact entitlements are generally <br /> <br />measured. or use is established, in terms of beneficial <br /> <br />consumptive use, meaning that new storage projects in and <br /> <br />of themselves do not fully protect Colorado's entitlement <br /> <br />-6- <br />