Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ie <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />,. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I,. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I. <br />. <br />. <br />,. <br />, <br />'. <br />. <br />. <br />(; <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br /> Drainage lOO-yr <br />Flooding Source Drainage Area Description Area (mi2) Discharge (cfs) <br /> Section 35 <br />Wood Gulch at mouth 18.11 Outside Bounds <br />Yeager Gulch at mouth 1.38 Outside Bounds <br /> <br />Taylor Park Reservoir does not provide flood control. Because it is likely that spillway facilities <br />have been designed to evacuate flood flows in excess of the l00-year discharge, it has been <br />assumed that reservoir will not affect downstream loo-year flood discharge. In actuality, there <br />will be some flood flow attenuation due to surcharge capacity in the reservoir and travel times <br />from the reservoir inflow points to the spillway. Storage in Blue Mesa Reservoir does not affect <br />floodplains in Gunnison County. <br /> <br />Peak flow records are available at several USGS streamflow gages within the county. USGS <br />Bulletin 17B procedures were used to calculate peak discharges for specific return intervals at <br />each of the gages containing adequate data for the estimation. The estimated l00-year discharge <br />using these procedures for each of the sites is shown in Table 4, while more detailed calculations <br />are shown in the Appendix. In general, the discharges shown in the table compare well to those <br />calculated using the regional equations. Because the gage flows measure actual peak flows, <br />where available, l00-year peak discharge as estimated from gage flows using Bulletin 17B <br />procedures should be considered more accurate than the regional equations and used for analysis <br />and design. <br /> <br />T bl 4 P k 100 <br /> <br />D' h <br /> <br />t: S I <br /> <br />d USGS G . Sta' <br /> <br />a e . ea -year ISC arge or eecte agIng hODS <br />USGS lOO-year <br />Station Station Discharge <br />ID Name (cfs) <br />09109000 Taylor River Below Taylor Park Reservoir, Co. 2,160 <br />09110000 Taylor River At Almont, Co. 4,123 <br />09 II 2500 East River At Almont Co. 5,830 <br />09113500 Ohio Creek Near Baldwin, Co. 1,604 <br />09118ooo Ouartz Creek Near Ohio City, Co. 820 <br />09124500 Lake Fork At Gateview, Co. 3,208 <br />09125000 Curecanti Creek Near Sapinero, Co. 568 <br />09126000 Cimarron River Near Cimarron, Co. 2,053 <br />09132500 North Fork Gunnison River Near Somerset, Co. 9,250 <br /> <br />Communities should regulate the approximate floodplains on a case-by-case basis. FEMA <br />requires that a detailed floodplain analysis must be performed by a professional engineer and <br />submitted by the developer or development proponent for development projects involving more 5 <br />acres or more than 50 units (whichever is more restrictive). <br /> <br />Hvdraulic Analvsis <br />Hydraulic methods used for the approximate floodplain delineations shown on the Gunnison <br />County FIRM panels are not available or have not been documented by FEMA. For future <br /> <br />7 <br />