Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />new conditions <br />~ new methodologies <br />comparison provided <br />compatible with previous flows <br />v' significantly different statistically <br />confidence limits <br />90% confidence interval <br />50% confidence interval <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />Diversion Characters: <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />Previous Studies: <br /> <br />does affect hydrology <br />does not affect hydrology <br />should not use stream data <br />from to <br /> <br />? <br /> <br />record s <br /> <br />existing <br />title <br />title <br />ti tIe <br /> <br />inform~n <br />./.5 <br /> <br />FINDING: <br /> <br />The hydrologic analysis ~ meets _____ <br />standards of ../ Rule 5. B. (detiiiled) or <br /> <br />does not meet the minimum <br />Rule 6.B. (approx.) <br /> <br />C. <br /> <br />Hydraulic Analysis <br /> <br />1, Water Surface <br />Profiles included: <br /> <br />c./ <br />,/' <br />-~ <br />../ <br /> <br />2, Floodplain c./ <br /> Boundaries: v <br />3, Methodology: a. L/ <br /> c./ <br /> b. <br /> <br />1o-year <br />50-year <br />lOo-year <br />500-year (optional) <br />frequency-elevation <br /> <br />table <br /> <br />lOO-year <br />50o-year (optional) <br /> <br />step backwater method <br />HEC-2 <br />other <br />alternative method <br />published manual <br />assumed depth method <br />depth stated on maps <br />geomorphic features method <br />history flood method <br />rating curve method <br /> <br />," <br />v' flood contour method etc. <br />map contour method etc. <br /> <br />4. Delineation <br />Procedures: <br /> <br />-8-. <br />