<br />-
<br />
<br />-- -
<br />
<br />8 Fort Collin~ Coloradoan
<br />
<br />- -
<br />
<br />August 1976
<br />
<br />Flood'plain zoning:
<br />Are there places
<br />people can't live?
<br />
<br />
<br />By JEANETI'E CHAVEZ
<br />OfllleWoradoon
<br />
<br />Prior to the Blg 'Thompson River
<br />flood, the mention of floodplain
<br />studies or zoning in Lartmer Cowlty
<br />evoked groans and often con-
<br />troversy over the possible con-
<br />flscaUon of property rights.
<br />And although the controversy
<br />surely still exists to some extent, the
<br />July 31 dJsaster has given impetus to
<br />completing studies that had been on
<br />the back burner so that some wning
<br />can be done.
<br />In fact, a temporary floodway
<br />district Ulne has been ln1t1aled from
<br />Estes Park east to the county Une
<br />and will be in effect for the next six
<br />months.
<br />What specitic land uses may be
<br />allowed for various sections of the
<br />canyon in the future will be based on
<br />those intensified studies which
<br />should be completed before the
<br />temporary zoning expires In
<br />Febrnaty.
<br />The zoning setting those land uses
<br />undoubtedly will be more restrictive
<br />than in the past. Very little could be
<br />done then because most of the homes
<br />and businesses in the canyon were
<br />built prior to the county's im.
<br />plementation of a zoning system.
<br />Now theN! Is the posslbUlty of
<br />more legal restrlcUon on what may
<br />be bullt there, but the situation
<br />facing the Larimer County Board of
<br />Comm1ssloners In the months to
<br />come should not be likened to
<br />starting with a clean slate upon
<br />which only the most advanced and
<br />sound planning techrtlques may be
<br />applied.
<br />What may seem "best" for the
<br />canyon and Jts residents may not
<br />jibew1threallty.
<br />
<br />AMONG 111E Issues facing the
<br />county officials are:
<br />
<br />-What rebuilding or new bullding
<br />should be allowed?
<br />
<br />-Will U.S. 34 be put back in the
<br />canyon in essentially the same way
<br />it was prlor to the flood? (Gov.
<br />Richard Lamm has lndicated a
<br />temporary road should be com.
<br />pleted along that route by June 1,
<br />1977, but he wants the permanent
<br />road to go over Pole Hill. )
<br />
<br />-What land should be acquired for
<br />a park or other pUblic use to
<br />preclude development of residences
<br />or businesses In the area? '
<br />
<br />-What land can be acquired?
<br />Some property owners do not want
<br />to sell their land i others are willing
<br />to almost give U away; others can't
<br />find their land because the survey
<br />describes the property using the
<br />middle of the river as a reference
<br />point. TIle river has changed
<br />channeIs though.
<br />UnW the floodplain studies are
<br />completed, many of these questions
<br />may remain unanswered. However,
<br />two factors are c1f!ar now.
<br />F1rst, the decision on the road will
<br />be made within the next six months,
<br />and although the commissioners will
<br />be able to recommend what route
<br />should be followed, the final decision
<br />rests squarely with the state.
<br />According to Rex Bums, the
<br />Larimer County planning staff
<br />member who has been working on
<br />the floodplain Identification effort In
<br />the past few years, all the other land
<br />use decisions pertalning to the
<br />canyon are dependent upon the
<br />decision on U.S. 34.
<br />Secondly, some landowners must
<br />be allowed to repair their homes.
<br />Bums said those homes that are less
<br />than half damaged may be repaired
<br />and bullding permits are being
<br />issued now for such work. '!bus far,
<br />two permits have been issued.
<br />Burns noted that tounty
<br />regulations require a pennlt tor any
<br />building work valued at more than
<br />$100. In the case of flood.damaged
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />homes, an inspector will have to
<br />check the home to determine the
<br />extent of damage before the pennit
<br />maybelssued.
<br />WHEN THE temporary flood zone
<br />regulation tor the disaster area was
<br />first considered, the term
<br />"moratorium" was used, implytng
<br />that no buIlding at all would be
<br />allowed in the area for six months,
<br />but that Is a misnomer.
<br />The regulation, according to
<br />Bums, applies to those homes that
<br />were damaged more than l'iO per cent
<br />or destroyed in the flood.
<br />It also applies to proposed new
<br />homes in the temporary f100dway
<br />district which the commissioners
<br />have defined as anything within the
<br />high water flood mark. Burns said
<br />he has had one inquiry concerning
<br />building a home on a previously
<br />undeveloped lot that Is within Ole
<br />temporary fioodway zone.
<br />Those homes that cannot be
<br />repaired or rebuilt until the com.
<br />m.lssionera adopt a pennanent flood
<br />zone are legally termed "non-
<br />existent" uses since they don't exist
<br />now, even though they did prior to
<br />the flood, Bums said. The homes
<br />which may be repaired after ob-
<br />ta1n1ng a building permit now will be
<br />considered "non-conforming uses"
<br />when the new zone is adopted.
<br />The pennanent zoning will not
<br />neeessar1.ly prohibit rebuilding on a
<br />site, but It may, depending upon
<br />""hat the boundaries of the two
<br />areas within any zone are. Those
<br />two arE'aB are kno.....ll as "floodway"
<br />and "flood fringe."
<br />Burns noted that construction
<br />usually is precluded in a floodway
<br />d1strtct, but in other cases has been
<br />allowed in the flood fringe If the
<br />bullding is constructed so the first
<br />floor is above the lOO-year flood
<br />level. If there is anything below that
<br />level, ltmust be "flood-proofed."
<br />A 100-year flood Is one with the
<br />disastrous effects expected to occur
<br />only once v.1thin 100 years. .
<br />However, the l()()..year level may
<br />not be the appropriate flood level for
<br />the BlgThompaon River. That is one
<br />of the things the floodplain studies
<br />now being conducted may help
<br />determine.
<br />Bums said floodplain study
<br />technIques were developed in the
<br />east and sometimes are not ap-
<br />propriate for the steep canyons of
<br />the Rocky Mountains.
<br />Ironically, the Federal Insurance
<br />Administration {FlA) had con.
<br />tracted with Gingery and Associates
<br />of Englewood on June 22, 1976, to do
<br />a hydrological study of the river just
<br />90lIth of Loveland and west to the
<br />mouth of the canyon. Now that study
<br />will be extended through the canyon.
<br />In addition, Burns said another
<br />f1rm will be hired through the bid.
<br />ding process to do photogrammetric
<br />survey mapping of the river. Bums
<br />said a third flrm, Wrlght-
<br />McLaughlin Engineers of Denver, is
<br />on a retainer through the governor's
<br />office to coordInate the hydrological
<br />and mapping studies.
<br />'lllose two studies will be com-
<br />bined into a "flood management
<br />study." The governor has suggested
<br />Wright.McLaughiin do that also,
<br />Bums said.
<br />The study will focus on what land
<br />uses are desirable for various areas
<br />of the canyon. It must consider past
<br />land use patterns and ownership
<br />patterns as well, Bums noted.
<br />The recovery panel which Is to be
<br />named by the governor and the
<br />commissioners will oversee
<br />development of the flood
<br />management plan, Bums said.
<br />The estimated $110,000 cost of the
<br />studies Is to be borne by a
<br />multiplicity of federal and state
<br />grants. Bums said about 70 per cent
<br />of the funding will be provided by the
<br />FlA, with the remainder coming
<br />from the Colorado Water Con-
<br />servation Board, Larimer County
<br />
<br />-
<br />
<br />..'""..'" 40-
<br />
<br />-
<br />
<br />)
<br />
<br />
<br />Path of destruction
<br />
<br />This aeriol photo shows the path of the Big Thompson River during the flood July 31. The river tore great chunks out of U.S. 34.
<br />
<br />lAP)
<br />
<br />(through a technical assistance
<br />grant from the Four Corners
<br />Regional Commission), and possibly
<br />the state highway department.
<br />The maps produced through that
<br />study will show both the traditional
<br />l00.year flood antlcipated level and
<br />the flood of record level. The flood of
<br />record is the most disastrous flood
<br />knoWn, and In this case Is the July 31
<br />cataclysm.
<br />
<br />TIlE OOUNTY commissioners
<br />will have at least two alternatives to
<br />consider based upon those maps and
<br />the management study.
<br />Fint, the entire pennanent zone
<br />could be the flood of record with the
<br />floodway being the tOO-year flood
<br />level.
<br />Secondly, the l~year level could
<br />be the zone with the floodway being
<br />Ole mid.section of that.
<br />Burns said it Is conceivable that
<br />the enUre canyon could be
<br />designated a f100dway.
<br />Also based UJXln the results of
<br />those studies, actuarial rates for
<br />flood insUrance for buildings withln
<br />the flood plain will be established,
<br />according to Jerome Olson, regional
<br />admlnistrator of the~. '
<br />UnW those actuartal tablet are
<br />establlshed, Olson said anyone in
<br />the county can buy fede9illy-
<br />,
<br />
<br />subsidized flOOd Insurance whether
<br />they are in an identllled flood area
<br />or not. The rate is .$25 per $10,000
<br />worth of coverage per year until
<br />then, he said.
<br />Previously existing structures
<br />(which become non-conforming
<br />uses in zoning) are always eligible
<br />for subsidized Insurance, he added.
<br />
<br />FeQerally.subsldized insurance
<br />has been available in the CQWlty
<br />since 1974. One property owner 1n
<br />the path of Ole Big Thompson fiood
<br />carried the Insurance. For a
<br />premium of $43, he has received
<br />$8,000 for repalrlng damage to his
<br />houSe, Burns said. The Insurance Is
<br />available through licensed property
<br />insurance agents or brokers.
<br />When the actuarial rates are
<br />establlshed, anyone attempting to
<br />bulld In the floodplain will find the
<br />costs prohibitive unless the buDding
<br />is constructed to be above the 100.
<br />year f1oo9 level. It will be
<br />proh1bitive In that banks will not be
<br />allowed to lend money for con-
<br />stroction unless flood insurance can
<br />be obtained.
<br />
<br />IF CONSTRUCTION isn't
<br />possible, what will property O'W1'lf!rs
<br />do with their land? What w1l1 Its
<br />value be?
<br />
<br />There are a number of alter-
<br />natives. It has been suggested that
<br />the county do something similar to
<br />what Rapid City, S.D., did after the
<br />flood there in 1972. TIle tovm bought
<br />much of the flood area thai had been
<br />devastated and turned it into a park.
<br />The commissioners are con-
<br />sidering how that may be ac-
<br />complishednow.
<br />Commission Chairman John
<br />Michie said, "We are looking at any
<br />money possible for acqulrlng (the
<br />land) for recreation and open
<br />space."
<br />He is concerned that land be
<br />bought to keep the economy in the
<br />area bolstered rather than having
<br />the bottom of the market fall out.
<br />Commissioner William Lopez
<br />tends to agree, expla1n1ng that if the
<br />COWlty is planning to acquire land, it
<br />should look at pre-flood land values.
<br />On the other hand, Gov. l.amm
<br />has Indicated that the state may buy
<br />BOrne land at post.f100d prices.
<br />The "big question mark" is
<br />whether there are enough funds
<br />available for acquisition, said
<br />Commissioner Warren Wolaver. If
<br />there is, a lot of land should be
<br />purchased. he suggested, adding, "I
<br />don't think anyone can ~e v.1th
<br />that."
<br />
<br />Burns, asked how he felt having
<br />worked on floodplain regulations,
<br />ZOll1ng and flood studies for the past
<br />few years to see the flood actually
<br />happen and verity what seemed to
<br />be "cry.wolf" warnings, replied:
<br />"It maltes me kind of sad. I can
<br />understand how people feel (that) Its
<br />a freak event...At the same time, the
<br />publ1c has to pay for these things.
<br />The principle that government steps
<br />In doing things for us ls not
<br />traditional" in America but It is
<br />becoming so. he said.
<br />And In the case of floodpla.1n8,
<br />"planners have the right Ideas," he
<br />explained-there are plac@8 people
<br />shouldn't live.
<br />
<br />BUr WHAT ABOtrr the existing
<br />buildings and the persons who want
<br />to continue to I1ve there even if they
<br />are In the path of another flOOd?
<br />
<br />wpez believes there are places
<br />the county should acquire for the
<br />future safety of the public and for
<br />future flood control. If a person
<br />wants to stay, "we have to try to
<br />make them aware of the negative
<br />aspects," and "to show them how it
<br />impinges on his neighbors."
<br />Nevertheless, he N!cognius that if
<br />the pome or business sUll is in
<br />existence, the county may be
<br />"stuck."
<br />
<br />Regulafions enforced for temporary zoning
<br />
<br />Although the boundaries of the
<br />floodway and flood fringe districts
<br />sWl must be establlshed, the general
<br />regulations covering floodplains
<br />already have been adopted by the
<br />county and are In force for the
<br />temporary zone in the canyort'
<br />Under those regulations, the only
<br />uses pennJtted in the floodway
<br />district without a special permit are
<br />agriculture, recreaUon and
<br />
<br />"residential accessory" uses.
<br />Conditions accompanying use
<br />without a permit are that it not
<br />obstruct the flow of the floodway nor
<br />will any structure or equipment be
<br />pennJtted.
<br />Special pennJts are Issued on
<br />several conditions Included that
<br />."no structure, deposit, obstroction
<br />or other use shall be allowed which
<br />acting alone or in combination with
<br />
<br />eJdstlng or future uses adverseiy
<br />affects the flow capacity of the
<br />floodway or Increases flood
<br />heights."
<br />Among the factors to be con-
<br />sidered by the commissioners in
<br />issuing special permlts are:
<br />- Danger to life.
<br />-Danger of mater1aIs being swept
<br />
<br />away to other land, thus creating
<br />the possibility of inJuringcthers.
<br />-Proposed water supplyand sewer
<br />systems and possible conaminatlon
<br />in the event of a flood.
<br />-Relationship of the ,roposal to
<br />the flood management JI'Ogranl for
<br />thellN'3.
<br />_ The safety of acress to the
<br />property In Urnes of 0004.."
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />-
<br />
|