Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />-- - <br /> <br />8 Fort Collin~ Coloradoan <br /> <br />- - <br /> <br />August 1976 <br /> <br />Flood'plain zoning: <br />Are there places <br />people can't live? <br /> <br /> <br />By JEANETI'E CHAVEZ <br />OfllleWoradoon <br /> <br />Prior to the Blg 'Thompson River <br />flood, the mention of floodplain <br />studies or zoning in Lartmer Cowlty <br />evoked groans and often con- <br />troversy over the possible con- <br />flscaUon of property rights. <br />And although the controversy <br />surely still exists to some extent, the <br />July 31 dJsaster has given impetus to <br />completing studies that had been on <br />the back burner so that some wning <br />can be done. <br />In fact, a temporary floodway <br />district Ulne has been ln1t1aled from <br />Estes Park east to the county Une <br />and will be in effect for the next six <br />months. <br />What specitic land uses may be <br />allowed for various sections of the <br />canyon in the future will be based on <br />those intensified studies which <br />should be completed before the <br />temporary zoning expires In <br />Febrnaty. <br />The zoning setting those land uses <br />undoubtedly will be more restrictive <br />than in the past. Very little could be <br />done then because most of the homes <br />and businesses in the canyon were <br />built prior to the county's im. <br />plementation of a zoning system. <br />Now theN! Is the posslbUlty of <br />more legal restrlcUon on what may <br />be bullt there, but the situation <br />facing the Larimer County Board of <br />Comm1ssloners In the months to <br />come should not be likened to <br />starting with a clean slate upon <br />which only the most advanced and <br />sound planning techrtlques may be <br />applied. <br />What may seem "best" for the <br />canyon and Jts residents may not <br />jibew1threallty. <br /> <br />AMONG 111E Issues facing the <br />county officials are: <br /> <br />-What rebuilding or new bullding <br />should be allowed? <br /> <br />-Will U.S. 34 be put back in the <br />canyon in essentially the same way <br />it was prlor to the flood? (Gov. <br />Richard Lamm has lndicated a <br />temporary road should be com. <br />pleted along that route by June 1, <br />1977, but he wants the permanent <br />road to go over Pole Hill. ) <br /> <br />-What land should be acquired for <br />a park or other pUblic use to <br />preclude development of residences <br />or businesses In the area? ' <br /> <br />-What land can be acquired? <br />Some property owners do not want <br />to sell their land i others are willing <br />to almost give U away; others can't <br />find their land because the survey <br />describes the property using the <br />middle of the river as a reference <br />point. TIle river has changed <br />channeIs though. <br />UnW the floodplain studies are <br />completed, many of these questions <br />may remain unanswered. However, <br />two factors are c1f!ar now. <br />F1rst, the decision on the road will <br />be made within the next six months, <br />and although the commissioners will <br />be able to recommend what route <br />should be followed, the final decision <br />rests squarely with the state. <br />According to Rex Bums, the <br />Larimer County planning staff <br />member who has been working on <br />the floodplain Identification effort In <br />the past few years, all the other land <br />use decisions pertalning to the <br />canyon are dependent upon the <br />decision on U.S. 34. <br />Secondly, some landowners must <br />be allowed to repair their homes. <br />Bums said those homes that are less <br />than half damaged may be repaired <br />and bullding permits are being <br />issued now for such work. '!bus far, <br />two permits have been issued. <br />Burns noted that tounty <br />regulations require a pennlt tor any <br />building work valued at more than <br />$100. In the case of flood.damaged <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />homes, an inspector will have to <br />check the home to determine the <br />extent of damage before the pennit <br />maybelssued. <br />WHEN THE temporary flood zone <br />regulation tor the disaster area was <br />first considered, the term <br />"moratorium" was used, implytng <br />that no buIlding at all would be <br />allowed in the area for six months, <br />but that Is a misnomer. <br />The regulation, according to <br />Bums, applies to those homes that <br />were damaged more than l'iO per cent <br />or destroyed in the flood. <br />It also applies to proposed new <br />homes in the temporary f100dway <br />district which the commissioners <br />have defined as anything within the <br />high water flood mark. Burns said <br />he has had one inquiry concerning <br />building a home on a previously <br />undeveloped lot that Is within Ole <br />temporary fioodway zone. <br />Those homes that cannot be <br />repaired or rebuilt until the com. <br />m.lssionera adopt a pennanent flood <br />zone are legally termed "non- <br />existent" uses since they don't exist <br />now, even though they did prior to <br />the flood, Bums said. The homes <br />which may be repaired after ob- <br />ta1n1ng a building permit now will be <br />considered "non-conforming uses" <br />when the new zone is adopted. <br />The pennanent zoning will not <br />neeessar1.ly prohibit rebuilding on a <br />site, but It may, depending upon <br />""hat the boundaries of the two <br />areas within any zone are. Those <br />two arE'aB are kno.....ll as "floodway" <br />and "flood fringe." <br />Burns noted that construction <br />usually is precluded in a floodway <br />d1strtct, but in other cases has been <br />allowed in the flood fringe If the <br />bullding is constructed so the first <br />floor is above the lOO-year flood <br />level. If there is anything below that <br />level, ltmust be "flood-proofed." <br />A 100-year flood Is one with the <br />disastrous effects expected to occur <br />only once v.1thin 100 years. . <br />However, the l()()..year level may <br />not be the appropriate flood level for <br />the BlgThompaon River. That is one <br />of the things the floodplain studies <br />now being conducted may help <br />determine. <br />Bums said floodplain study <br />technIques were developed in the <br />east and sometimes are not ap- <br />propriate for the steep canyons of <br />the Rocky Mountains. <br />Ironically, the Federal Insurance <br />Administration {FlA) had con. <br />tracted with Gingery and Associates <br />of Englewood on June 22, 1976, to do <br />a hydrological study of the river just <br />90lIth of Loveland and west to the <br />mouth of the canyon. Now that study <br />will be extended through the canyon. <br />In addition, Burns said another <br />f1rm will be hired through the bid. <br />ding process to do photogrammetric <br />survey mapping of the river. Bums <br />said a third flrm, Wrlght- <br />McLaughlin Engineers of Denver, is <br />on a retainer through the governor's <br />office to coordInate the hydrological <br />and mapping studies. <br />'lllose two studies will be com- <br />bined into a "flood management <br />study." The governor has suggested <br />Wright.McLaughiin do that also, <br />Bums said. <br />The study will focus on what land <br />uses are desirable for various areas <br />of the canyon. It must consider past <br />land use patterns and ownership <br />patterns as well, Bums noted. <br />The recovery panel which Is to be <br />named by the governor and the <br />commissioners will oversee <br />development of the flood <br />management plan, Bums said. <br />The estimated $110,000 cost of the <br />studies Is to be borne by a <br />multiplicity of federal and state <br />grants. Bums said about 70 per cent <br />of the funding will be provided by the <br />FlA, with the remainder coming <br />from the Colorado Water Con- <br />servation Board, Larimer County <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />..'""..'" 40- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />) <br /> <br /> <br />Path of destruction <br /> <br />This aeriol photo shows the path of the Big Thompson River during the flood July 31. The river tore great chunks out of U.S. 34. <br /> <br />lAP) <br /> <br />(through a technical assistance <br />grant from the Four Corners <br />Regional Commission), and possibly <br />the state highway department. <br />The maps produced through that <br />study will show both the traditional <br />l00.year flood antlcipated level and <br />the flood of record level. The flood of <br />record is the most disastrous flood <br />knoWn, and In this case Is the July 31 <br />cataclysm. <br /> <br />TIlE OOUNTY commissioners <br />will have at least two alternatives to <br />consider based upon those maps and <br />the management study. <br />Fint, the entire pennanent zone <br />could be the flood of record with the <br />floodway being the tOO-year flood <br />level. <br />Secondly, the l~year level could <br />be the zone with the floodway being <br />Ole mid.section of that. <br />Burns said it Is conceivable that <br />the enUre canyon could be <br />designated a f100dway. <br />Also based UJXln the results of <br />those studies, actuarial rates for <br />flood insUrance for buildings withln <br />the flood plain will be established, <br />according to Jerome Olson, regional <br />admlnistrator of the~. ' <br />UnW those actuartal tablet are <br />establlshed, Olson said anyone in <br />the county can buy fede9illy- <br />, <br /> <br />subsidized flOOd Insurance whether <br />they are in an identllled flood area <br />or not. The rate is .$25 per $10,000 <br />worth of coverage per year until <br />then, he said. <br />Previously existing structures <br />(which become non-conforming <br />uses in zoning) are always eligible <br />for subsidized Insurance, he added. <br /> <br />FeQerally.subsldized insurance <br />has been available in the CQWlty <br />since 1974. One property owner 1n <br />the path of Ole Big Thompson fiood <br />carried the Insurance. For a <br />premium of $43, he has received <br />$8,000 for repalrlng damage to his <br />houSe, Burns said. The Insurance Is <br />available through licensed property <br />insurance agents or brokers. <br />When the actuarial rates are <br />establlshed, anyone attempting to <br />bulld In the floodplain will find the <br />costs prohibitive unless the buDding <br />is constructed to be above the 100. <br />year f1oo9 level. It will be <br />proh1bitive In that banks will not be <br />allowed to lend money for con- <br />stroction unless flood insurance can <br />be obtained. <br /> <br />IF CONSTRUCTION isn't <br />possible, what will property O'W1'lf!rs <br />do with their land? What w1l1 Its <br />value be? <br /> <br />There are a number of alter- <br />natives. It has been suggested that <br />the county do something similar to <br />what Rapid City, S.D., did after the <br />flood there in 1972. TIle tovm bought <br />much of the flood area thai had been <br />devastated and turned it into a park. <br />The commissioners are con- <br />sidering how that may be ac- <br />complishednow. <br />Commission Chairman John <br />Michie said, "We are looking at any <br />money possible for acqulrlng (the <br />land) for recreation and open <br />space." <br />He is concerned that land be <br />bought to keep the economy in the <br />area bolstered rather than having <br />the bottom of the market fall out. <br />Commissioner William Lopez <br />tends to agree, expla1n1ng that if the <br />COWlty is planning to acquire land, it <br />should look at pre-flood land values. <br />On the other hand, Gov. l.amm <br />has Indicated that the state may buy <br />BOrne land at post.f100d prices. <br />The "big question mark" is <br />whether there are enough funds <br />available for acquisition, said <br />Commissioner Warren Wolaver. If <br />there is, a lot of land should be <br />purchased. he suggested, adding, "I <br />don't think anyone can ~e v.1th <br />that." <br /> <br />Burns, asked how he felt having <br />worked on floodplain regulations, <br />ZOll1ng and flood studies for the past <br />few years to see the flood actually <br />happen and verity what seemed to <br />be "cry.wolf" warnings, replied: <br />"It maltes me kind of sad. I can <br />understand how people feel (that) Its <br />a freak event...At the same time, the <br />publ1c has to pay for these things. <br />The principle that government steps <br />In doing things for us ls not <br />traditional" in America but It is <br />becoming so. he said. <br />And In the case of floodpla.1n8, <br />"planners have the right Ideas," he <br />explained-there are plac@8 people <br />shouldn't live. <br /> <br />BUr WHAT ABOtrr the existing <br />buildings and the persons who want <br />to continue to I1ve there even if they <br />are In the path of another flOOd? <br /> <br />wpez believes there are places <br />the county should acquire for the <br />future safety of the public and for <br />future flood control. If a person <br />wants to stay, "we have to try to <br />make them aware of the negative <br />aspects," and "to show them how it <br />impinges on his neighbors." <br />Nevertheless, he N!cognius that if <br />the pome or business sUll is in <br />existence, the county may be <br />"stuck." <br /> <br />Regulafions enforced for temporary zoning <br /> <br />Although the boundaries of the <br />floodway and flood fringe districts <br />sWl must be establlshed, the general <br />regulations covering floodplains <br />already have been adopted by the <br />county and are In force for the <br />temporary zone in the canyort' <br />Under those regulations, the only <br />uses pennJtted in the floodway <br />district without a special permit are <br />agriculture, recreaUon and <br /> <br />"residential accessory" uses. <br />Conditions accompanying use <br />without a permit are that it not <br />obstruct the flow of the floodway nor <br />will any structure or equipment be <br />pennJtted. <br />Special pennJts are Issued on <br />several conditions Included that <br />."no structure, deposit, obstroction <br />or other use shall be allowed which <br />acting alone or in combination with <br /> <br />eJdstlng or future uses adverseiy <br />affects the flow capacity of the <br />floodway or Increases flood <br />heights." <br />Among the factors to be con- <br />sidered by the commissioners in <br />issuing special permlts are: <br />- Danger to life. <br />-Danger of mater1aIs being swept <br /> <br />away to other land, thus creating <br />the possibility of inJuringcthers. <br />-Proposed water supplyand sewer <br />systems and possible conaminatlon <br />in the event of a flood. <br />-Relationship of the ,roposal to <br />the flood management JI'Ogranl for <br />thellN'3. <br />_ The safety of acress to the <br />property In Urnes of 0004.." <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />- <br />