Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,\ <br />. '\,~\. <br />" 'tV" <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />" <br />;.: <br />~ <br /><3 <br />" <br />ff <br />t <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />;:~ <br /> <br />; <br /> <br />I <br />" I,.. <br />i 1fi511~ ~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />l.,...., . .'.. <br />. ... .w:,. . '" . <br />l,.:'.';,.."..~~~ ~...." "" <br />~~..~.~. '1): ~'-' "'~ '!;;.)'--~ .r.", <br /> <br />..'0' f ., . <br />. . <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />maintaining equilibrium in the total watershed systenl <br />The federal program for structural control of flood- <br />ing also failed to provide an effective deterrent to coastal <br />flooding. The programs were aimed predominantly at the <br />riverine environment, largely because little hurricane ac- <br />tivity occurred during the period in which early flood- <br />rehued legislation was passec.i Consequentl)'; little C0l14 <br />gressional attention v."'<i'l focused on the unique problems <br />of the coastal environment <br /> <br />New Focus of Federal Policy <br />I n the middle 1960'S there \vas a reassessment of national <br />policy and the beginning of a shift to a more comprehen- <br />sive approach to flooding. Paramount wa.'l the recognition <br />that structural works needed to be complemented by <br />nonstructural meas,ures. Rather than trying solely to pre- <br /> <br />Flood control projects can <br />have numerous henefits <br />They often generate hydro- <br />electric power and create <br />recreation and can..,erlJa- <br />tion habitat'.:;. <br /> <br /> <br />Ill} <br /> <br /> <br />~,,+' <br /> <br />,p <br />r <br /> <br />.-- <br /> <br /> <br />II _ <br />l'j~ <br />1,1 , '!j- <br />I" L <br /> <br />/' <br /> <br />23 <br />