|
<br />hydrologic analyses utilized more sophisticated methods, were based on
<br />more complete basic data, and because the regional analysis method used in
<br />the drainage study does not differentiate for snowmelt, runoff from
<br />general rain, and runoff from cloudburst storms. The drainage study flow
<br />data are appropriate for design purposes.
<br />
<br />The present study is authoritative for the purposes of the Flood Insurance
<br />Program, and all data presented here either supersede or are compatible
<br />with all previous determinations.
<br />
<br />7.0 LOCATION OF DATA
<br />
<br />Survey, hydrologic, hydraulic, and other pertinent data used in this study
<br />were furnished to the Director, Insurance & Mitigation Division, Federal
<br />Emergency Management Agency, Denver Federal Center, Building 710, Lakewood,
<br />Colorado 80225.
<br />
<br />8.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES
<br />
<br />1. u.s. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District, Floon Hazard
<br />Informatiop_:__ S~_garnR.9c:lt__Spri~g.~-,-~9Iq:f_a.do, February, 1976
<br />
<br />2. Water Resources Council, lIA Uniform Technique for Determining Flood
<br />Flow Frequencies," Bulletin IS, December 1967
<br />
<br />3. u.s. Weather Bureau, Technical Paper No. 38, Generalized Estimates of
<br />Proba~~e Maximum Precipitation for the United States West qf__the
<br />105th Meridian, 1960
<br />
<br />4. U. S. Forest Service, Annual Streal!!.Ll,_o~_ .SumIJiaries from __Four S~alpine
<br />wate~~~eds_in Colorado, 1972
<br />
<br />5.
<br />
<br />National Weather Service, Hydrometeorological
<br />Maxim1lI!!. Thu}:-!:9-~rstorm ~E_e~il?_~ tation Esti~ates,
<br />(Preliminary Draft), 1972
<br />
<br />Branch, probable
<br />Southwest States
<br />
<br />6. u.s. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, HEC-2
<br />Water Surf9_~_._?!ofi~~_Ge!!.~ra).._~~_e_~_ _C_~~puteE_ I?r.S'gram, Davis,
<br />California, October 1973
<br />
<br />7. Routt County Planning Commission, Topographic Map, Scale 1:2400,
<br />Contour Interval 2 feet
<br />
<br />8. Dales Y. Foster, Inc., Topographic Map, Scale 1:4800, Contour Interval
<br />S feet, Steamboat Springs Area
<br />
<br />9. State of Colorado, Topographic Maps, Scales 1:2400 and 1:4800,
<br />Contour Interval 2 feet --~-
<br />
<br />10. u.s. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District, Topographic Map,
<br />Scale 1:4800, Contour Interval 5 feet or less
<br />
<br />39
<br />
|