Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />without electricity, and Mrs. Artzer was immobile at the time, due to a very recent hip <br />replacement. However, they recall watching the rising flood waters illuminated by <br />frequent lightning. They have two rain gauges near their house that they read regularly. <br />Mr. Artzer considered going out to check them during the stonn, but the water was too <br />high. When he checked the next day, they were both full to a depth of about six inches <br />and overflowing. The Artzers have a long history of reading and recording daily rainfall <br />and were disappointed to have missed that measurement. The following day, as he <br />recalled (July 31), he went up to a stock tank on the hill about one mile north of their <br />house. It had been empty, but was full to a depth of 14" when he measured it. He <br />credited all that rain to the storm, but he also noted that about 1 112" had fallen the <br />previous evening (July 28). <br /> <br />The location of the stock tank was T 9N R 57W in the extreme SE comer of Sec. 16. As <br />I visited and photographed the stock tank, I found it totally open and exposed on the top <br />of the hill overlooking the Pawnee Creek valley to the south - beautiful remote setting, It <br />had just rained 112" before I arrived July 29, 1998 (based on Mr. Artzer's gauges) so I <br />tried to measure it in the tank. I noted a very uneven concrete bottom with depth <br />measurements varying from 0 to more than 2 inches depending on the location in the tank. <br /> <br />In summary, there is considerable evidence of extreme rainfall near the Artzer's home <br />during the evening of July 29th. Mr. Artzer's estimate of 14" was not unreasonable but <br />could have varied depending on exactly where in the uneven-bottomed tank he took his <br />measurement. Also, the rain from the previous evening and, in fact, from other rains in <br />late July, were likely included to some extent in the measurement. In my estimation, <br />taking the stock tank's unevenness into account and the rain that had fallen the <br />previous night, plus any evaporation that may have occurred, an estimate of 12" <br />would have been more reasonable with "B" confidence, <br /> <br />Guy Whitlock <br /> <br />T ION R 56W Sec. 20 SW <br />Original rain report: 12" in 5-gallon bucket <br /> <br />He and his wife were not at home for the storm. They had left on the 28th for Wyoming. <br />No measurements were taken at their home on Highway 71. However, when they <br />returned soon after the storm, they found 12 inches of water in what he described as a <br />straight-sided 5-gallon bucket on their land approximately two miles east of their house <br />(see location above). <br /> <br />There was no easy way to evaluate this measurement, as the bucket was no longer there <br />and no one lives at the site. Without a doubt, very heavy rain fell at this location along <br />Spring Creek. However, there are two concerns that must be considered with this report, <br />First, it appeared from the timing of the Whitlock's trip to Wyoming, that the bucket was <br />probably placed there before the rain began on the evening of the 28th, Based on nearby <br />reports one-half mile away (Virgil Johnson), 1.5 inches fell late on the 28th and would <br />have still been in the bucket along with the later rain. Secondly, there is the question of <br />whether the bucket was truly straight sided. For the most common shapes of 5-gallon <br /> <br />11 <br />