My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02417
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02417
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:24:23 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:52:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Guidelines on Community Local Flood Warning and Response Systems
Date
8/1/1985
Prepared For
US
Prepared By
Hydrology Subcommittee
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Mitigation/Flood Warning/Watershed Restoration
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />TWo categories of floods account for most flood losses: those affecting land <br />areas adjacent to streams or rivers (riverine flooding), and those affecting <br />the shorelines of lakes, bays, and oceans. The main concern of this report is <br />riverine flooding and, in particular, locations in which flash floods are <br />likely to occur. In riverine situations, flooding results from rainfall <br />and/or snowmelt runoff that exceeds the capacity of the main channel of the <br />river or stream (bank full capacity). Flooding can also result from such <br />causative events as the breach of a dam or levee, or an ice jam. The source <br /> <br />of the threat can vary from a small creek or drainage to a large river such as <br /> <br />the Mississippi or the Ohio. A community can be vulnerable to many sources of <br />riverine flooding. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Both structural and nonstructural methods have been used to try to limit flood <br />damages. The structural methods include channel enlargement and the <br />construction of levees, reservoirs, and bypasses. While such structural <br /> <br />measures can greatly reduce the threat of flooding and consequent losses, they <br /> <br />may create a false sense of security and encourage development in partially <br /> <br />protected areas. Thus, when a rare flood occurs, even greater flood losses <br /> <br />may be sustained. This may contribute to the rising trend in flood damages <br />shown in Figure 2. Nonstructural strategies for reducing flood losses include <br />the regulation of flood plain use, floodproofing of buildings, temporary or <br />permanent evacuation of threatened areas, and the development of flood <br /> <br /> <br />forecasting and flood warning systems. The goal of a local flood warning and <br /> <br /> <br />response system is to reduce losses by increasing the length of warning time <br /> <br /> <br />in which a community can react to a potentially damaging event and, given the <br /> <br />extra warning time, improve its response. The time between the causative <br /> <br />.,. <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.