My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02366
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02366
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:24:14 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:51:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
All
Basin
Statewide
Title
The Big Thompson Flood of 1976 Field Trip Guidebook
Date
1/1/1976
Prepared For
Annual meeting of Geological Society
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Sheet erosion. Areas of sheet erosion are common on gentle to moder- <br /> <br />ate slopes throughout the Big Thompson Canyon. As indicated by behavior <br /> <br />during the July 31 - August 1 rainstorms and flooding, sheet erosion occurs <br /> <br />most commonly where rainfall is so intense that the infiltration capability <br /> <br />of surficial materials is exceeded. On granitic terrain subjected to great <br /> <br />rainfall intensity during the flood (6 - 7 cm/hr), where protection from <br /> <br />erosion by soil cover was minimal, fluvial transport of grus resulted in <br /> <br />removal of as much as 25 cm of regolith. Due to better developed soils and <br /> <br />despite lower permeability, surficial materials derived from metamorphic <br /> <br />rocks appear to be somewhat less susceptible to sheet erosion than those de- <br /> <br />rived from granitic rocks. On steeper slopes sheet erosion is replaced by <br /> <br />rillwash and gullying. <br />Erosional downcutting of drainage ways. With increasing slope of well- <br /> <br />defined channels and side slopes, water velocity and volume in these channels <br /> <br />increases greatly, resulting in downcutting and removal of smaller caliber <br /> <br />lag material that accumulates in the channel during times of normal seasonal <br /> <br />runoff. In the higher parts of most tributary drainages to the Big Thompson <br /> <br />River, headward downcutting of channels through a riffle-and-pool sequence <br /> <br />appears to be the dominant mode of channel erosion. In these areas, eroded <br /> <br />material is fine (pebble size and smaller) and the microrelief of riffles and <br /> <br />pools is typically no more than 2 m. In the intermediate and lower parts of <br /> <br />these same drainage basins, stream gradients typically increase to 200 - 400 <br /> <br />m/km and stream competence is sufficient to move all but the largest boulders. <br /> <br />Near the confluence with the Big Thompson River or other trunk streams, <br /> <br />channel gradients decrease somewhat, but in many cases sufficient velocity <br /> <br />and volume of floodwaters were present during the recent heavy rainstorms to <br /> <br />carry and remove nearly all accumulated bedload, leaving a scoured bedrock <br /> <br />surface. <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.