My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02366
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02366
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:24:14 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:51:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
All
Basin
Statewide
Title
The Big Thompson Flood of 1976 Field Trip Guidebook
Date
1/1/1976
Prepared For
Annual meeting of Geological Society
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />the substrate on which structures rest, erosion of roadways and other <br /> <br />earth-fill structures, and partial to complete burial of manmade works by <br /> <br />detritus. These processes occur at rates ranging from imperceptibly slow <br /> <br />to rapid and are often episodic, as for example in the case of landslides <br /> <br />and soil creep. Landslides are most common when ground moisture conditions <br /> <br />approach saturation or when slopes are naturally or artificially cut. The <br /> <br />majority of rockfalls, however, seem to be related to springtime freeze- <br /> <br />thaw cycles or occurrence of moderate to heavy rainstorms. Debris avalanch- <br /> <br />ing and sliding, as well as spectacular fluvial events accompanying storms <br /> <br />such as the Big Thompson event, appear to be aperiodic in that precise <br /> <br />short term temporal and aerial prediction is very difficult if not im- <br /> <br />possible. Determination of location, rate and frequency of hazardous geo- <br /> <br />morphic processes is a desirable research goal in many geologic hazard <br /> <br />studies. <br /> <br />Geomorphic Criteria For Identification Of Geologic Hazard Areas <br /> <br />Recognition of geologic hazard sites in the Big Thompson Canyon area <br /> <br />can be accomplished in two ways. Distinctive landforms and deposits pro- <br /> <br />vide nearly unequivocal evidence when definitely related to active hazardous <br /> <br />processes. Slope, thickness and composition of surficial materials are <br /> <br />frequently good indicators of hazard areas as well. In both cases, the <br /> <br />degree of hazard is also a function of recurrence and severity of the <br /> <br />associated processes and specific site planning for structures and human <br /> <br />activities. Therefore, identification of geologic hazard sites is straight- <br /> <br />forward in the presence of observable field evidence whereas quantification <br /> <br />of risk is usually difficult and may be subjective. <br /> <br />Soil creep. Soil creep is the relatively slow downslope migration of <br /> <br />regolith, In the Big Thompson Canyon soil creep is most commonly associated <br /> <br />with fine-grained, unconsolidated colluvial deposits on moderate to steep <br /> <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.