My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02337
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02337
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:24:09 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:49:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State
Stream Name
South Platte River
Basin
South Platte
Title
Geomorphic Assessment at Surveyed Cross-sections South Platte River
Date
6/1/1996
Prepared For
UDFCD
Prepared By
Michael Stevens
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The sediment on the bed of the South Platte River is small cobbles (2 to 5 inches in diameter) <br />in the steeper upstream reaches to cobbles, gravel, or sand in the lower reaches. But deposits <br />of sand, gravel, or cobbles can be found resting together in many places. In the Urban section, <br />often there are chunks of concrete rubble or riprap on the channel bed. In a few spots, the weak <br />rock of the Denver Formation outcrops on the river bed. There is such a spot between Cross <br />Sections 13 and 14 and another between Cross Sections 47 and 48. The Denver Formation <br />erodes very slowly so it controls riverbed degradation. <br /> <br />In the Rural segments, there is often a very small depression between a side bar and the river <br />bank, almost always dry at low flow. This depression appears to be influential in maintaining <br />a linear growth of woody vegetation along the base of the bank, mostly willows and <br />cottonwoods. <br /> <br />Degradation is the general lowering of the river bed in a long reach of river over time. In <br />contrast, aggradation is a general increase in the bed level. If the lowering is local, not over a <br />long reach, it is general scour. General scour occurs, for example, in the river under a bridge <br />with an opening less than that of the river upstream. The scour holes in the bed around bridge <br />piers are local scour. <br /> <br />To help identifY aggradation and degradation, the history of the thalweg level and average bed <br />level at each monitored cross section was studied (Table 3). If both the thalweg and the average <br />bed level changed in one direction in the period of record, then degradation or aggradation is <br />said to have occurred. The thalweg level can change but the average bed level does not. This <br />is not aggradation or degradation. Sometimes, the average bed level cycles up and down from <br />the mean without much net change during the period of record (Fig. 3). This cyclic behavior is <br />deemed stable, the same as if the bed did not change. <br /> <br />In all, the river bed is judged to be stable. The severe degradation experienced in the early <br />1980's (Stevens et a1. 1990) is no longer to be found. In 1996, 15 cross sections had degradation, <br />the most being 2.0 and 2.7 ft at Cross Sections 37 and 38, respectively (Fig. 4). Ten of these <br />experiencing lowering are in the Urban reach between Cross Sections 29 and 43, with much of <br />the lowering occurring in 1995, the apparent result of the long, high spring runoff. <br /> <br />Four cross sections experienced aggradation. Three of these are in the downstream Suburban <br />reach between 104th Avenue and Interstate 270. The other is Cross Section 9 in the Rural <br />Reach. The most aggradation was 2.1 ft at Cross Sections 9 and 28. <br /> <br />In June 1986, the river was flowing through a 22-ft deep gravel pit at Cross Section 23. In <br />November 1987, the pit had filled with river-transported sediments and has remained stable until <br />construction on channel modifications for water quality improvement in this reach began in <br />1995. The modifications were undertaken by the Metro Wastewater Reclamation District at an <br />estimated construction cost of$2,372,000. Aggradation immediately upstream at Cross Section <br />24 was the apparent result of the Metro project. <br /> <br />Construction ofthe Confluence Park river improvement has resulted, by design, in lowering the <br />river bed 2.0 and 2.7 ft upstream at Cross Sections 37 and 38. <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.