My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02336
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02336
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:15:22 AM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:49:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
57
County
Adams
Arapahoe
Douglas
Community
Denver Metro Region
Stream Name
Lena Gulch
Basin
South Platte
Title
Master Drainage Plan - Revision to Lena Gulch on sheet 8 of Volume II
Date
3/1/1976
Designation Date
3/1/1976
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />111-13 <br /> <br />General Reach to Reach Sensitivitf. The investigations of various <br />schemes revealed the gulch sensitivities to alternative improvements <br />in various reaches. The Maple Grove Reservoir provides somewhat of <br />a breakpoint between the upper and lower reaches, since channel improve- <br />ments do not significantly change the flows below. <br /> <br />The channel ization of flow through the trai ler COLlrts would not increase <br />the peak discharge significantlY. <br /> <br />The channelization of flow below Maple Grove Reservoir would increase <br />the required channel capacity from Ki~ing Street to Clear Creek. <br /> <br />Channelization of Reach 3 would significantly increase peak fJo", rates <br />and subsequent flooding in the upper residential area of Reach 6. <br /> <br />Maple Grove Reservoir. The routing of flood waters through Maple Grove <br />Reservoir has quite a pronounced effect on the downstream flood flOlvs. <br />This is due to the storm water stora<je capabi 1 ity of the reservoi r <br />coupled with the ability to release waters at a lower rate than incoming <br />flows. As can be Seen in Table 111..2, the effect 011 strearnflo", wi thout <br />Maple Grove Reservoir increases the flow about 75% over having the exist- <br />ing facility in place. <br /> <br />The reader can refer to Section IX for an evaluation of Map.le Grove <br />Reservoir. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.