My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02324
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02324
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:24:07 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:48:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
32
County
Adams
Community
Federal Heights
Basin
South Platte
Title
Water and Drainage at Niver Creek, Phases 1 and 2: Cities of Federal Heights and Thornton, Colorado
Date
2/1/1974
Designation Date
6/1/1974
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />in the early case of Garnet Ditch & Reservoir Co. v. Sampson. 110 P79. <br />48 Colo. 285 (1910). In this case a rule of absolute liability was <br />imposed based on the statute then in effect Section 2272, Mills' Ann. St. <br />and that the statute is contained verbatim in our present law at 1963 CRS <br />148 5-4 as follows: <br /> <br />"Liability of owners for damage. - The owners of the <br />reservoirs shall be liable for all damage arising from <br />leakage or overflow of the waters therefrom or by floods <br />caused by breaking of the embankments of such <br />reservoirs. " <br /> <br />This case is the law in Colorado and is still viable in spite of its <br />age as shown in the case of Cass Company-Contractors vs. Colton. <br />279 P2d 415, 130 Colo 593 (1955) where, in a case involving <br />damages for blasting it is cited with the Court's approval as follows: <br /> <br />"In other types of cases, but involving the same <br />legal theory, Colorado cases have followed the <br />doctrine of absolute liability for certain dangerous <br />enterprises, such as the impounding of waters. <br />CRS, "53, 147 5-4. In the case of Garnet Ditch <br />Company v. Sampson 48, Colo. 285, 110 P79, 80, <br />1136, our Court cited with approval the following: <br /> <br />"':"~'~ The true rule of law is, that the person who, <br />for his own purposes, brings on his own land and <br />collects or keeps there anything likely to do mis- <br />chief if it escapes, must keep it at his own peril; and <br />if he does not do so, is prima facie answerable for <br />damages which is the natural consequence of its <br />escape. ,:,,:,,:," (Emphasis supplied) <br /> <br />As you can see the liability of the owners of the dam is absolute and <br />in the event of leakage, breakage or overflow in this area the <br />owner could have a good deal of exposure depending on the factual <br />circumstances relating to an occurrence. <br /> <br />2. Storage of water <br /> <br />I regard the letter of the State Engineer, dated August 2, 1973, address- <br />ed to D. J. Gianola as correctly stating the law contained in 1963 eRS <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.