Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />Mr. L. Scott Tucker <br />February 15, 1974 <br />DG 223/74 - Page Two <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Preliminary Designs <br /> <br />Preliminary designs for the entire Niver Creek have been prepared in accord- <br />ance with the decisions reached by the District at their meeting of August 14, 1973 <br />and summarized by Mr. J. Gianola in his letter of August 15, 1973 to the various <br />entities involved in the study. <br /> <br />Most of the channel has been designed for the 100-year flood; certain structures <br />have been designed for lesser flows; and portions of the channel have been recommended <br />for flood plain zoning in lieu of providing channel improvements. The decision to design <br />for flows less than the 1oo-year flood was based on a comparison of construction costs <br />with resulting damages. <br /> <br />The recommended preliminary designs are presented in Plates 1\ 1-3 through <br /> <br />111-12. <br /> <br />Cost Estimates <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Field constructian costs for the project have been computed and are summarized <br />in Table IV-3. The total field construction cost is estimated to be $1,762,000; however, <br />this figure does not include engineering fees, legal fees or land acquisition costs as dis- <br />cussed in the report. We estimate that these costs will increase the total project cost to <br />$2,500,000. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />The overall estimated project cost is less than the estimate given in the Phase A <br />report, because the present designs are more refined than those used in the Phase A report <br />and because economies were achieved by modifying the channel improvements conceived <br />during the Phase A studies. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />A table of average annual costs of the "Do-Nothing" and recommended schemes <br />is also presented to readily allow a comparison of the benefit which can be derived by <br />implementing the proposed scheme. <br /> <br />Conclusion <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />The work performed in Phase B confirms the conclusion of the Phase A report <br />that the recommended i~rovements wi II be very effective and economical in reducing <br />flood damoge in the Niver Creek Basin. <br /> <br />.. <br />