My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02285
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02285
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:24:01 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:45:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State
Stream Name
All
Basin
South Platte
Title
Alluvial Fan Flooding
Date
1/1/1996
Prepared For
State of Colorado
Prepared By
National Research Council
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />46 <br /> <br />ALLUVIAL FAN FLOODING <br /> <br /> <br />because of the rearrangement of the channel system by remobilization of deposited debris, as <br />described in the previous section. Also, the flood characteristics on adjacent or nearby fans <br />resulting from the same storm commonly are different because of local differences in rainstorm <br />intensity, sediment availability in the source areas, and the respective differences in recent flow <br />path history. <br />Although flooding accounts depict varied properties in time and space, they show certain <br />distinctive properties when considered collectively. High flood flow velocities were reported for <br />about half of the sites listed in Appendix A. Supercritical flow velocities for water floods are also <br />suggested at other sites by the steep fan slopes and low hydraulic roughness associated with fine- <br />textured surface sediments and simple channel geometries. Flash floods (short-lived floods with a <br />short time to peak) are reported at eight sites, including accounts of translatory waves at the <br />Chicago Creek, British Columbia; Horseshoe Park, Colorado; and Montrose, California, alluvial <br />fans. At the Cottonwood Canyon, Magnesia Spring Canyon, and Montrose alluvial fans in <br />California the reported combination of high flow velocities, flashy flow, unstable channels, and <br />movement of flow paths produced an especially serious hazard that resulted in loss of life at two <br />of the fans. <br />Sheetflooding and distributary flow also are typical of alluvial fan flooding. Unstable <br />channel boundaries are common, while stable channel beds or banks are less frequent, as <br />suggested by accounts at only 5 of the sites studied. Flow path movement was reported for 8 <br />sites, no movement for 13 sites, and either no mention of movement or absence of movement at <br />the remaining 8 sites. A possible reason for the lack of flow path movement and disruption of the <br />surface of some of the active fans is the short duration of the floods in concert with a limited <br />supply of unconsolidated medium to coarse material from the drainage basin. Typical distributary <br />channels appear to scour and fill; however, stable flow paths do occur during individual floods. <br />The Carefree and Wild Burro alluvial fans in Arizona are examples of less active or <br />inactive fans with some channel incision and a limited supply of medium-to-coarse sediment from <br />the drainage basin. Most of the sediment delivered to the fans is carried by streamflow and is <br />coarse sand and fine gravel. The basins are not very steep. For example, the basin of the Carefree <br />fan is a pediment. On these fans the channels are slightly trenched below the surrounding fan <br />surface and are lined with desert trees and shrubs. During recent major floods, there was no <br />movement of the many distributary channels on either of these fans. <br />Flood hazards on the least active fan surfaces, such as the Carefree (see Chapter 4) and <br />Wild Burro alluvial fans, can be deceptively small because of the small size of distributary <br />channels and the rather long distances from mountainous drainage basins. For example, shallow <br />floodflow unexpectedly entered several small defined channels during a major flood on the Saddle <br />Mountain, Arizona, alluvial fan (USACE, 1993). A subsequent field investigation revealed no new <br />channel formation on the fan. Rather, small distributary channels that in places appeared to be <br />simple topographic lows conveyed overflow from the larger distributary channels or carried runoff <br />from high-intensity rainfall directly on the fan surface. Many less active alluvial fans in the arid <br />southwestern United States have developed soils with small, slightly incised stable flow paths that <br />convey shallow high-velocity floodflow during major floods. <br />Flood control works such as levees and debris dams at several of the sites were partially or <br />totally ineffective during major floods. For example, at Day and Deer creeks (Figure 2-2), <br />Henderson Canyon (see Chapter 4), and Magnesia Spring Canyon alluvial fans in California, the <br />flood control structures were overwhelmed, and floodwater followed original flow paths and fan <br /> <br /> <br />;\ <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.