Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2.3.1 EROSION AND SCOUR <br /> <br />Where sand dunes existed before Hurricane Opal, significant loss of dune height and width <br />was observed. Many dunes were breached or flattened (see Figure 2-3). Those that remained after <br />the storm were scarped and weakened. Dunefuce retreat of 75 feet to 100 feet was observed in <br />several locations. Overwash of eroded dune sediments was common, sometimes extending over <br />500 feet inland and causing burial of roads and at-grade consuuction by 1 to 4 feet of sand. <br /> <br />In some cases, an estimated 10 to 20 feet of vertical relief was lost at the seaward edge of high <br />dune and bluff areas. Many suuctures atop high dunes or bluffs collapsed because of a loss of <br />support, either from the undermining of slab foundations or from inadequate pile embedment <br />(see Figure 2-4). <br /> <br />Ground levels at many front-row elevated structures that survived Hurricane Opal were <br />typically reduced 3 to 7 feet, or more. In addition, local scour depressions were observed at the <br />bases of many piles, indicating that 6 to 12 inches of additional soil was lost immediately adjacent <br />to the piles. Scour during the storm probably rendered greater than 6 to 12 inches of soil around <br />the piles unsupporting. <br /> <br />Large scour depressions were observed where large volumes of water flowed during the <br />storm. Depressions measuring 10 to 40 feet in length and width and 2 to 4 feet in depth were <br />observed around some pile-supported structures and near the corners of some at-grade <br />consuuction. SUUctures that seemed particularly vulnerable included the following: <br /> <br />. structures at the landward termination of roads and driveways that funneled floodwaters <br />toward the sUUctures <br /> <br />. suuctures between drainage basins or lakes and larger bodies of water <br />. suucture5 near locations where floodwaters crossed or breached the barrier islands <br /> <br />2.3.2 DEBRIS <br /> <br />Small debris was widespread, ranging from household items to construction materials. These <br />items did not cause structural damage to buildings, foundations, or other building components. <br />Evidence of much larger debris shifted by floodwaters was also observed, including pier piles and <br />braces, concrete slabs, dumpsters, automobiles, boats, and collapsed houses (see Figure 2-5). <br />Many of these objects washed into buildings, and some caused structural damage. <br /> <br />2.3.3 SLAB FOUNDATIONS <br /> <br />Many slab failures were noted in all types of structures (see Figure 2-6). The m,!jor reason for <br />these failures was the loss of support coupled with a lack of reinforcing in the slabs. Welded <br />reinforcing wire fabric was observed in many slabs but did not prevent failure of the slabs once <br />they were undermined. <br /> <br />HURRICANE OPAL IN FLORIDA <br /> <br />2-3 <br />