My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02256
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02256
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:23:55 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:44:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
431
County
Larimer
Community
Unincorporated Larimer County
Basin
South Platte
Title
Flood Insurance Study - Larimer County, CO, Unincorporated Areas Volume I of III
Date
3/1/1996
Designation Date
7/1/1996
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4.2 Floodways <br /> <br />Encroachment on flood plains, such as structures and fill, reduces <br />flood-carrying capacity, increases flood heights and velocities, <br />and increases flood hazards in areas beyond the encroachment <br />itself. One aspect of flood' plain management involves balancing <br />the economic gain from flood plain development against the <br />resulting increase in flood hazard. For purposes of the NFIP, a <br />floodway is used as a tool to assist local communities in this <br />aspect of flood plain management. Under this concept, the area of <br />the lOa-year flood plain is divided into a floodway and a floodway <br />fringe. The floodway is the channel of a stream, plus any adjacent <br />flood plain areas, that must be kept free of encroachment so that <br />the lOa-year flood can be carried without substantial increases in <br />flood heights. Minimum Federal standards limit such increases to <br />1.0 foot, provided that hazardous velocities are not produced. The <br />floodways in this study are presented to local agencies as minimum <br />standards that can be adopted directly or that can be used as a <br />basis for additional floodway studies. <br /> <br />The floodways for this study were divided into two categories based <br />upon the location of the stream. The mountain area criteria were <br />based upon the channel of the stream plus all flood plain areas <br />where the depth of flooding was 18 inches or greater and the <br />floodway fringe area was the area where flooding depths were 18 <br />inches or less and velocities were 3 feet per second or less <br />(Figure 7). The plains area criteria were based upon the criteria <br />of equal- conveyance reduction from each side of the flood plain <br />with a O.S-foot limitation on flood height, provided that hazardous <br />velocities are not produced (Figure 8). <br /> <br />The floodways for the Big Thompson River upstream of Lake Estes and <br />Black Canyon Creek were based upon the criteria of equal conveyance <br />reduction from each side of the flood plain with a 1.0-foot <br />limitation of increased flood height, provided that hazardous <br />velocities are not produced (Figure 8). The floodway for the Fall <br />River was based upon the criteria of equal conveyance reduction <br />from each side of the flood plain with a 1.O-foot limitation on <br />increased energy grade line, <br /> <br />It was decided for portions of the Dry.Creek floodway to permit <br />encroachment to a point where the maximum rise in the lOa-year <br />water-surface elevation would be no greater than 1.0 foot as <br />computed in the Dry Creek report (Reference 1). <br /> <br />The results of these computations are tabulated at selected cross <br />sections for each stream segment for which a floodway is computed <br />(Table 2). <br /> <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.