Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Numerous irrigation canals cross the Dry Creek channel and directly <br />intercept drainage flows, as mentioned previously. Several of <br />these canals, including the Larimer and Weld Canal (Eaton Ditch), <br />the Larimer County Canal, the Terry Inlet, the Poudre Valley Canal, <br />and the North Poudre Ditch, ~ave large enough flow capacity to <br />significantly affect flood magnitudes on Dry Creek, For the more <br />frequent flood events, the Larimer and Weld Canal (Eaton Ditch), <br />the Larimer County Canal, and the Terry Inlet were assumed to <br />intercept all Dry Creek flows reaching their channels <br />(Reference 1). <br /> <br />As development within the basin continues, these canals will <br />intercept greater flows on a more frequent basis. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />This will increase the probability of sporadic overflows from the <br />canals, which can cause severe damage, particularly if an <br />embankment fails. For this reason, separation of drainage flows <br />and irrigation flows should be considered for at least the lower <br />frequency events (Reference 1). <br /> <br />There are no flood-control structures on the Cache La Poudre River <br />in the study area, although there are two irrigation dams on the <br />North Fork Cache La Poudre River, The effect of the two dams is <br />considered negligible in the study area. There are no flood- <br />control structures that reduce discharges on Buckhorn Creek, <br />Redstone Creek, Fish Creek, Black Canyon Creek, or the Fall River. <br /> <br />3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS <br /> <br />For the flooding sources studied in detail in the community, standard <br />hydrologic and hydraulic study methods were used to determine the flood <br />hazard data required for this study. Flood events of a magnitude which <br />are expected to be equaled or exceeded once on the average during any <br />10-, 50-, 100-, or SOO-year period (recurrence interval) have been <br />selected as having special significance for flood plain management and <br />for flood insurance rates. These events, commonly termed the 10-, 50-, <br />100-, and SOO-year floods, have a 10, 2, 1, and 0.2 percent chance, <br />respectively, of being equaled or exceeded during any year. Although <br />the recurrence interval represents the long term avera2e period between <br />floods of a specific magnitude, rare floods could occur at short <br />intervals or even within the same year. The risk of experiencing a rare <br />flood increases when periods greater than 1 year are considered. For <br />example, the risk of having a flood which equals or exceeds the 100-year <br />flood (1 percent chance of annual exceedence) in any 50-year period is <br />approximately 40 percent (4 in 10), and, for any 90-year period, the <br />risk increases to approximately 60 percent (6 in 10). The analyses <br />reported herein reflect flooding potentials based on conditions existing <br />in the community at the time of completion of this study. Maps and <br />flood elevations will be amended periodically to reflect future changes. <br /> <br />11 <br />