My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02248
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02248
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:23:53 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:43:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Clear Creek
Community
Georgetown
Stream Name
Clear Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
Flood Hazard Mitigation Report
Date
9/1/1998
Prepared For
Georgetown
Prepared By
Montgomery Watson
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Mitigation/Flood Warning/Watershed Restoration
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Often these residences have encroached into the historic channel with concrete, rock or wood <br />retaining- walls and the channel has, as a result, been confined to a narrow corridor through most <br />of town. This narrowing and straightening of the creek channel has reduced its flood carrying <br />capacity and exacerbated flooding problems. The number and proximity of low-lying homes has <br />created the possibility for significant property damage. Finally, the lack of existing right-of-way <br />and physical space for construction severely limits options for flood control. <br /> <br />An additional factor influencing the selection of flood control alternatives is the historic <br />character of the town. Established in 1868 on the strength of local mining activities, Georgetown <br />has been declared a Historic Landmark as part of the Georgetown-Silver Plume National Historic <br />Landmark District and contains nUmerous buildings on the National Historic Register. The <br />restored downtown area, centered on 6th Street, is a summer tourist attraction. Residents of the <br />town and other citizens with an interest in historic preservation will be especially sensitive to the <br />aesthetic qualities of proposed flood control projects. This fact has been taken into consideration <br />in the evaluation of alternatives. <br /> <br /> TABLE 4-1 <br />EXISTING HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS <br />FOR GEORGETOWN FLOODING SOURCES <br /> Existing Existing <br /> 10- Y r 25-Yr 50- Yr 100- Y r Limiting Protection <br />Flooding Source Reach Flow Flow Flow Flow Capacity Level <br /> (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (years) <br />Upper Clear Creek (I) 600 730 830 910 730 25 <br />Lower Clear Creek (2) 980 1190 1330 1480 630 <10 <br />South Clear Creek 420 520 580 640 275 <10 <br /> <br />Of the 88 structures located in the 100-year floodplain, 69 are single family residences, 7 are <br />multi-family residences, and 12 are commercial buildings (restaurants, hotels) and public <br />buildings such as churches. No critical facilities such as police stations, fire stations, or schools <br />are located in the mapped 100-year floodplain. The portion of the Clear Creek floodplain <br />immediately upstream of Georgetown Lake is of interest to the Town as a future recreational trail <br />corridor connecting the Lake with the historic downtown area. <br /> <br />(I) <br />(2) <br /> <br />Upstream of South Clear Creek confluence <br />Downstream of South Clear Creek confluence <br /> <br />TABLE 4-2 <br /> <br />4.5 <br /> <br />PROBLEM STATEMENT <br /> <br />RECURRENCE INTERVAL OF RECENT FLOODING EVENTS <br />IN GEORGETOWN, COLORADO <br /> <br />a. <br /> <br />The 100-year flood on Clear Creek and South Clear Creek affects 76 homes and 12 <br />commercial and public buildings in the Town of Georgetown. Many are historic <br />buildings built right on the channels. <br /> <br />Year of Flooding <br /> <br />Approximate Recurrence <br />Interval <br />(years) <br /> <br />b. <br /> <br />Repetitive flooding on South Clear Creek (four times in the past 30 years) threatens 17 <br />homes with inundation, affects many other buildings with basement flooding, and results <br />in road closures. However, there are no repetitive loss structures, as identified by FEMA, <br />located in Georgetown. <br /> <br />1995 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />1984 <br /> <br /><10 <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />. No critical facilities are located within the 100-year flood area. <br /> <br />1983 <br /> <br /><10 <br /> <br />d. <br /> <br />Traditional flood control solutions as well as many nonstructural alternatives are difficult <br />to apply in Georgetown due to the historic character of the affected properties. <br /> <br />1965 <br /> <br />70 <br /> <br />e. The Town does not currently own or control maintenance of channel banks where past <br />improvements (floodwalls and cribbing) have been constructed. <br /> <br />f. Many structures are impacted by high groundwater associated with heavy spring runoff. <br /> <br />4-3 <br /> <br />4-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.